now browsing by tag
The press service of the North Atlantic Alliance has published a special statement on the situation with the gas pipelines of the Nord Stream system. It says that the position of the block is shared by the invited members of the alliance
Damage of Nord Stream 1 gas pipelines and Nord Stream 2 are a deliberate sabotage, according to NATO. This is stated in a press release published on the website of the North Atlantic Alliance.
“All currently available information indicates that this is the result of deliberate, reckless and irresponsible acts of sabotage. These leaks pose risks to shipping and cause significant damage to the environment. We support ongoing investigations aimed at establishing the origin of the damage,— the message says.
“Any deliberate attack on critical Allied infrastructure will be met with a unified and decisive response,”— NATO assured.
About the unprecedented destruction on two gas pipelines of the company «daughter» “Gazprom” Nord Stream AG said Tuesday morning, September 27th. “The destruction that occurred on the same day simultaneously on three strings of the offshore gas pipelines of the Nord Stream system is unprecedented,” the company said in a statement. The pressure dropped sharply in branch A of the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline and in both lines of Nord Stream 1.
Seismologists in Denmark and Sweden recorded powerful explosions in areas where there were leaks from the Nord Stream gas pipeline. The Swedish Coast Guard on the morning of September 29 reported that a fourth leak had been discovered on gas pipelines, with two of the four leaks occurring in the exclusive economic zone of this country.
Russia intends to convene a meeting of the UN Security Council in connection with the “provocations” in relation to the Nord Stream 1 gas pipelines; and Nord Stream 2.
German security authorities launched an investigation. According to Der Tagesspiegel sources, two main versions are being considered— that it could have been an operation by Ukrainian forces or a Russian operation carried out under a “false flag”.
Read on RBC Pro Pro 6 exercises to prevent problems due to sedentary work Instructions Pro Stressed shoulders and neck: 5 exercises to relieve stress Instructions Pro Cross-pollination: how the environment forms leaders, and leaders form the environment Instructions Pro Promotions and crypto is a game into an eagle. Are there any investment ideas left in Russia? employer needs to know Instructions
The Kremlin called the assumptions about Russia's involvement in the accidents “predictably stupid.” Both lines of Nord Stream 2 filled with gas, all systems are ready for pumping, and this gas is very expensive. <…> And now this gas is escaping into the air, — said the press secretary of the President Dmitry Peskov. At the same time, the Kremlin did not make any specific accusations, stating that a thorough investigation is needed.
Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said that the accidents on gas pipelines occurred in an area controlled by US intelligence agencies. According to her, Sweden and Denmark, in whose special economic zones the accidents occurred, are “stuffed with American weapons”; and the situation there is “totally controlled by American intelligence agencies.”
However, she did not directly blame the United States. “Here we are not talking about the readiness [to accuse], here we are talking about the beginning of a big job,” Zakharova noted.
Aircraft of the North Atlantic Alliance fly about 30-35 times every week along the Belarusian border for reconnaissance purposes, said State Secretary of the Security Council of the Republic Alexander Volfovich.
According to him, four flights were recorded today reconnaissance aircraft, TASS reports.
Volfovich noted an increase in the number of exercises that NATO conducts in European countries. He said that the alliance grouping in Eastern Europe has about 35,000 military personnel, more than two thousand aircraft, there are 15 warships in the Mediterranean and Baltic Seas, including two nuclear submarines, an aircraft carrier, and more than 300 cruise missiles.
Former assistant to US President Ronald Reagan, Doug Bandow, said earlier that the United States needs to prevent Ukraine from joining NATO or an organization similar to the alliance in order to avoid Kyiv's defense dependency in the future.
Rate the material
Hungarian Foreign Minister Szijjártó: it is necessary to avoid a direct conflict between Russia and NATO /v6_top_pics/resized/673xH/media/img/1/54/756640042253541.jpg 673w” media=”(max-width: 320px) and (-webkit-min-device-pixel-ratio: 2), (max-width : 320px) and (min-resolution: 192dpi)” >
In the current situation, it is important to prevent a conflict between Russia and the North Atlantic Alliance because of its consequences, said in an interview with RIA Novosti Hungarian Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto.
“Now this is the most important task— to avoid any direct conflict between Russia and NATO, since this will lead us to such consequences that neither side wants, — he said.
Szijjártó said that since the end of February, the expectation that there would be no major wars in the world has become illusory. In his opinion, a clash between Moscow and NATO would jeopardize the existence of the planet, and Hungary, in this regard, takes the position that alliance forces should not be sent to Ukraine. The Minister stressed that the resolution of the conflict depends largely on the dialogue between Russia and the United States.
The Russian side has repeatedly accused NATO of direct or indirect participation in the conflict in Ukraine. In early August, the first deputy head of the presidential administration, Sergei Kiriyenko, said that the Ukrainian authorities “gave away their country, their territory, and, worst of all, their people for use.” The West and NATO, which unleashed a “fundamental confrontation” against Russia.
The North Atlantic Alliance denies its direct participation in the conflict, but NATO countries supply Ukraine with weapons. In addition, they emphasized that the bloc is not looking for a confrontation with Moscow, but will respond to its actions in the event of an attack on one of the NATO members.
In July, the alliance adopted a new Strategic Concept, in which Russia is called the main threat block security. In accepting the document, NATO member countries also called on Moscow to stop the special operation in Ukraine.
Read on RBC Pro Pro Existential horror: why Apple intimidates buyers , which will only strengthen his Articles Pro 90 days before the shutdown of foreign cybersecurity systems. What to do Pro How To Valuing Real Estate During Turbulence: What Owners Need to Know Pro Articles 9 Ways to Quickly Recover from Stress Pro How To Do Why Email Has Made Employees Unhappy: 3 Reasons Pro Articles “Pay Growth For Years”: What It's Like To Work At Cisco – In 5 Points Articles Authors Tags Who is not subject to partial mobilization
Understanding the mailing list
Plot World History with Andrey Sidorchik
Western leaders have launched a series of statements that boil down to one — there is no threat to Russia's security from representatives of the North Atlantic Alliance.
“NATO is not looking for a conflict with Russia”
“NATO is not looking for a conflict with Russia”, — announced Alliance Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg. “Putin says he had to act because Russia was threatened. But no one threatened Russia,», — declared at the UN General Assembly US President Joe Biden. In the same place, the new British Prime Minister Liz Truss said: “No one threatens Russia.”
In general, if you believe these words, our country is surrounded exclusively by pacifists, and the security threat &mdash ; this is purely Russian paranoia.
In 1996, director Tim Burton released the dark humor film Mars Attacks! In it, the inhabitants of the Red Planet, who arrived on Earth with predatory goals, are chasing earthlings with blasters and destroying them, while saying: “Don't run away! We are your friends! We came in peace!»
Perhaps this is the best illustration of the attitude of the West towards our country since the end of the Second World War.
The plan for the destruction of the Soviet Union from the Commander of the Order “Victory”
The last salvos of the war with the Nazis had not yet died down, and the Prime Minister of Great Britain Winston Churchill had already given the order to the Joint Planning Staff of the War Cabinet about preparing a plan code-named “The Unthinkable” — operations against the Red Army in Europe. Moreover, to implement it, it was planned to use, among other things, units of the Wehrmacht that had just surrendered to the Western allies.
The attack was to begin on July 1, 1945. However, the British generals announced to Churchill — the success of the attack cannot be guaranteed. Therefore, the “Unthinkable” sent to the archive. But that was only the beginning.
After the atomic attack on Hiroshima and Nagasaki by order of US President Harry Trumanin the fall of 1945, the development of the “Totality” plan began. It provided for an atomic attack on 20 Soviet cities, including Moscow and Leningrad, large industrial centers, as well as a number of capitals of the Union republics. The headquarters of Dwight Eisenhower — by the way, a holder of the Soviet military order “Victory”.
“Tasks Regarding Russia”: what America wanted to turn the USSR into
In 1948, the memorandum “Tasks Regarding Russia” was issued in the United States. According to him, after the victory of the United States, Russia:
- should not be so militarily strong as to threaten its neighbors;
- must grant broad autonomy to national minorities;
- must be economically dependent on the outside world;
- must not establish a new Iron Curtain.
Within the framework of the military plans of the United States, atomic strikes on the territory of the Soviet Union were supposed to be carried out from military bases located in the allied countries of the United States in Europe and Asia.
On March 17, 1948, five Western European states — Belgium, UK, Luxembourg, Netherlands and France — concluded the so-called Brussels Pact, the key provision of which was the creation of “collective self-defense”. Germany was considered as a possible aggressor in case the militarists returned to power, but first of all, the USSR was considered as an enemy.
«Dropshot»: destruction of millions of Soviet people and occupation
On April 4, 1949, 12 countries, among which were the signatories of the Brussels Pact, the United States, Canada, as well as Denmark, Italy, Norway, Portugal and Iceland, concluded the North Atlantic Treaty. The first Secretary General of NATO Ismay Hastings formulated the purpose of the organization's existence rather succinctly: “Keep the Soviet Union out, the Americans — inside, and the Germans — in a subordinate position.
In the same 1949, the US Joint Chiefs of Staff approved the Dropshot plan, according to which 300 atomic bombs were to be dropped on 100 largest cities and industrial centers of the USSR. In addition, it was supposed to strike with conventional bombs, which were supposed to be dropped on the heads of Soviet citizens by 250 thousand tons. Dropshot Plan assumed the prevention of retaliatory strikes from the USSR, the complete destruction of its military infrastructure, the occupation of the defeated country with the division of four “zones of responsibility”: the Western part of the USSR, the Caucasus — Ukraine, Ural — Western Siberia — Turkestan, Eastern Siberia — Transbaikalia — Primorye.
According to the Dropshot plan, only the first phase of the US atomic attack was supposed to take 20 million human lives. As for the 40 million victims, the Americans were not sure — they made them dependent on the level of resistance offered by the Soviet side. At the same time, the plan indicated that due to large-scale destruction, the life of the survivors would be “very complicated.”
“The unrealistic nature of the proposal does not deserve discussion”: how the USSR was not taken into NATO
The creation by the Soviet Union of its own atomic bomb in 1949 reduced the possibility of planning nuclear attacks against our country, but by no means made it completely abandoned.
At the same time, NATO representatives publicly stated that their bloc was aimed solely at ensuring peace. When Turkey was included in NATO in 1952, again declaring the peaceful nature of the organization, Joseph Stalinsarcastically remarked: “Shouldn't we join NATO then?”
On March 31, 1954, the government of the USSR sent an official note asking for admission to the North Atlantic Alliance. The document stated: “The North Atlantic Treaty Organization would cease to be a closed military grouping of states, it would be open to the accession of other European countries, which, along with the creation of an effective system of collective security in Europe, would be of paramount importance for strengthening world peace.”
The West's answer was exhaustive: “The unrealistic nature of the proposal is not worth discussing.”
On May 9, 1955, West Germany was admitted to NATO. That is, in violation of all previous agreements of the countries — members of the anti-Hitler coalition made the country that initiated the Second World War a member of the military bloc.
179 nuclear strikes on Moscow
In 2015, the United States declassified plans for nuclear strikes on the USSR, drawn up by the US Strategic Air Command (SAC) in 1956. The plan included two detailed lists of more than a thousand targets, each in the territory of the USSR and its friendly countries, which were to be hit with nuclear weapons.
After the destruction of Soviet military airfields, as well as command posts, which, according to the authors of the plan, should have led to the impossibility of a retaliatory strike, it was planned to move on to the second part of — destruction of the industrial centers of the USSR in order to destroy the military industry of the Soviet Union. As conceived by American strategists, civilian objects also fell into the number of targets. Particular attention was paid to Moscow and Leningrad.
179 targets were included in the list of targets subject to an atomic strike in Moscow, in Leningrad — 145 targets.
American researchers who studied the plan stated that it provided for the targeted destruction of the civilian population of the Soviet Union. It was about tens of millions of people.
The reverse side of the Caribbean crisis: what was Comrade Khrushchev wrong about?
The peak of the Cold War historians often refer to the Cuban Missile Crisis, which began with the secret operation Anadyr as — the transfer of Soviet medium-range missiles with nuclear warheads to Cuba. The American side called these actions of the Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev reckless.
But there is one caveat. In 1961, by order of US President John F. Kennedy, 15 American PGM-19 Jupiter medium-range missiles were deployed near the Turkish city of Izmir. with nuclear warheads.
The range of these missiles was 2,400 kilometers, which allowed them to hit the European part of the USSR, including Moscow.
The main advantage of medium-range missiles is the minimum time to reach the target. The flight time of American missiles from Turkey was less than 10 minutes. Thus, the ability of the Soviet side to take countermeasures in the event of a strike was reduced to a minimum.
Therefore, the actions of the USSR were in fact only an equivalent response. But in the United States, an incredible hysteria began at the thought that not only they could threaten destruction.
A new round
The Cuban Missile Crisis had a positive moment — there was some sobering up in the West, which later resulted in detente in the 1970s, when several important strategic arms limitation treaties were signed at once. But by the end of the decade, everything started all over again.
In 1979, the NATO Council decided to deploy more than 500 American medium-range missiles with nuclear warheads in Europe. In response, the Soviet side announced the deployment of its missiles on the territory of Czechoslovakia and the GDR.
By 1987, 108 Pershing-2 missile launchers were deployed in West Germany. and 64 Tomahawk missile launchers. In Great Britain there were 112 launchers of American Tomahawks, in Italy — 112, in the Netherlands — 16.
Perestroika, and then the collapse of the socialist bloc and the USSR, it would seem, ended the Cold War. The Soviet Union, which was initially declared a threat to NATO, did not become, and, therefore, the existence of the North Atlantic Alliance lost its meaning.
However, the alliance has not gone away. The idea of a neutral status for a united Germany remained an idea — the former socialist GDR actually became part of NATO.
In 1997, the founding act of Russia was signed — NATO, which declared that the parties do not consider each other as adversaries.
In 1999, two very important events took place. First — inclusion in the alliance of three former members of the Soviet bloc (Hungary, Poland, Czech Republic). The second — NATO armed aggression against Yugoslavia, which resulted in the separation of the province of Kosovo.
Thus, the promises of NATO's non-expansion to the East were buried, and the alliance itself carried out a large-scale offensive operation, which had no analogues in Europe since 1945.
Russia, based on statements about the peaceful nature of NATO, again proposed to consider the question of our country's inclusion in the alliance.
How Vladimir Putin wanted to join NATO
In 2000, Vladimir Putinin an interview with the BBC, he said he was considering Russia's membership in NATO: “Why not? I do not rule out such a possibility — in the event that the interests of Russia will be considered, if it is a full partner.
The same topic was also discussed at the talks with US President Bill Clinton. In 2017, Putin recalled this as follows: “During the discussion, I said:“ Maybe look at the option that Russia will join NATO. Clinton replied, “I don't mind.” But the entire delegation was very nervous.”
In 2004, the so-called “fifth enlargement of NATO” took place. The bloc included not only the former socialist countries, but also the former republics of the USSR: Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia.
Russian politicians have repeatedly posed the question to Western partners: if NATO's expansion to the East is not directed against Russia, then what kind of does it make sense? And why in new countries — NATO members find themselves at the helm of politics not only with an agenda that is not neutral, but openly hostile to Moscow?
Why did the US withdraw from the ABM Treaty?
On December 13, 2001, US President George Bush Jr. announced the US unilateral withdrawal from the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty (ABM). This document, signed in 1972, was one of the cornerstones of nuclear security.
The American side argued that the refusal of the treaty was connected with the desire to ensure their own security on the part of Iran, North Korea and other so-called “rogue states”. Representatives of Russia reasonably noted that plans to deploy anti-missile position areas near the borders of the Russian Federation could not be considered otherwise than as an attempt to reduce the possibility of a nuclear potential for a retaliatory strike. This corresponds to the concept of “disarming strike” adopted in the US nuclear doctrine; — that is, Washington will strike first with its own forces so that the enemy will not have the opportunity to retaliate.
Thus, the situation can be returned to 1945, when the first plans for unpunished atomic aggression against our country were being developed, which provided for the destruction of tens of millions of people, followed by occupation.
“Against whom is this expansion against?”
In 2007, speaking at a security conference in Munich, Vladimir Putin stated: “The process of NATO expansion has nothing to do with modernizing the alliance itself or with ensuring security in Europe. On the contrary, it is a serious provoking factor that reduces the level of mutual trust. And we have a fair right to ask frankly: who is this expansion against? And what happened to the assurances given by the Western partners after the dissolution of the Warsaw Pact? Where are these statements now?.. Now they are trying to impose on us already new dividing lines and walls — albeit virtual, but still dividing, cutting our common continent. Will it really take many years and decades again, a change of several generations of politicians, to “sort” and “dismantle” these new walls?»
Western politicians considered that speech aggressive. In fact, it was an announcement that Russia intends to protect its interests and its citizens.
Alas, there was no sobering up in the West. Decades of the history of the North Atlantic Alliance clearly prove — NATO has no other ultimate goal, except for the destruction of Russia. And all the talk about a peaceful nature is a fairy tale.
Rate the material
The former US president then asked his Russian colleague whether he really admits the possibility that the United States will strike at Russia. Yeltsin answered in the negative
Bill Clinton and Boris Yeltsin, 1997
Former US leader Bill Clinton (1993-2001; 42nd President of the United States) spoke in an interview with CNN about a conversation with his Russian counterpart Boris Yeltsin about NATO's eastward advance. He said he asked the Russian president if he really considered the possibility of the United States striking Russia.
“I asked him, 'Do you really think I'm going to use a base in Poland to bomb Russia?' He replied: “No, but many in Russia think so because their historical memory includes Hitler and Napoleon.”
Clinton acknowledged this, but noted that historical ideas about Russia, in turn, is associated with such rulers as Ivan the Terrible, Peter I and Catherine II, when the Russian state “controlled its neighbors.” However, the ex-president is convinced, “people no longer want to be controlled,” they want to choose their own path.
The former American leader does not believe that NATO expansion, which began during his presidency, can be blamed for the outbreak of hostilities in Ukraine. He stressed that the US and NATO were not going to threaten Russia. Moreover, according to him, he offered Russia “not only a special partnership with NATO, but also the prospect of possible NATO membership.”
Russian President Vladimir Putin has repeatedly said that NATO countries have not kept promises not to expand “not one inch”; to the East. «I will repeat— deceived, and in popular language, they just threw it,— said, in particular, Putin in an address on February 24, the day the Russian military operation in Ukraine began. He recalled that in December 2021, Moscow once again tried to negotiate with the United States and its allies, but “all in vain.” The head of state called “further expansion of the infrastructure of the North Atlantic Alliance, the military development of the territories of Ukraine” unacceptable. “The problem is that in the territories adjacent to us, — I note that in our own historical territories, & mdash; a hostile “anti-Russia” is being created, which is placed under complete external control, is intensively settled by the armed forces of the NATO countries and is pumped up with the most modern weapons, — he said then.
The fact that Washington offered Yeltsin and Putin the possibility of Russia joining NATO, Clinton spoke back in the spring. He called untrue claims that the United States in any way tried to isolate Russia, showed disrespect or completely ignored it. At the same time, the former American leader agreed that the alliance really sought to expand eastward, despite Moscow's objections, calling NATO's actions at that time “correct and consistent decisions.”
Read on RBC Pro Pro “I found out about my resignation by phone”: the head of Adidas on turns in his career greens: how Europe is returning to fossil fuels Articles Pro How to open a Russian bank account in a foreign bank Instructions Pro Theory U: how to make the right decisions in business and life Articles Pro Why night snacks are dangerous not only for the figure Studies Pro “Eat, move, sleep”: how simple rules will help you live longer
Clinton said that he met with Yeltsin 18 times, and with Putin— five. “This is only three less than all the meetings between the leaders of the USA and the USSR from 1943 to 1991. The notion that we have ignored, disrespected, or tried to isolate Russia is false,” — he noted.
In 2017, Putin, in an interview with American director Oliver Stone, said that it was he who suggested that Clinton think about Russia joining NATO.
Authors Tags The Central Bank lowered the rate: what will happen to loans and deposits
Understanding the newsletter
The alliance at the end of June decided to increase the number of rapid reaction forces by eight times and deploy heavy equipment near the borders of Russia. According to the head of the Military Committee, NATO is implementing what it planned a few years ago =”(max-width: 320px) and (-webkit-min-device-pixel-ratio: 2), (max-width: 320px) and (min-resolution: 192dpi)” >
NATO started planning for a stronger defense a few years ago, Admiral Rob Bauer, head of the alliance's military committee, told a press conference.
“We are talking about the biggest reorganization of our military structures since 1949. We started planning this a few years ago, but now we are implementing it,— he said.
At the NATO summit in Madrid at the end of June, the leaders of the alliance countries agreed in 2023 to increase the number of rapid reaction forces by almost eight times— up to 300 thousand people. Until 2014, it was planned that the scale of such forces would not exceed a division and amount to about 13,000 servicemen. NATO countries will train and finance these forces for the defense of certain territories in the east, and heavy equipment and weapons will be deployed on the border with Russia.
The new NATO Strategic Concept adopted at the summit calls Russia “the most serious and direct threat to the security of NATO members and peace and stability in the Euro-Atlantic region.”
NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said that the bloc had been preparing for a confrontation with Russia since 2014 and the military operation in Ukraine did not come as a surprise to him. “Therefore, we increased our military presence in the east of the alliance and NATO began to invest more money in defense,” — he explained.
According to Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov, the decisions of the NATO summit in Madrid fix the course for aggressive containment of Russia, but will not affect Russian policy, and Moscow “in any case” will ensure its safety.
Read on RBC Pro Pro Which design method helped the iPhone beat the Blackberry OFZ. Is it worth investing in public debt? creator of the Roblox gaming platform Articles Authors Tags Subscribe to Telegram
The appearance of NATO troops on the territory of Ukraine may lead to the start of a nuclear war.
The American magazine Foreign Affairs reported that the appearance of NATO troops on the territory of Ukraine could lead to the outbreak of a nuclear war.
According to the authors of the article, at the moment, the United States, together with its allies, is trying to prevent any kind of escalation of the conflict that could provoke a direct conflict between the alliance and Russia.
“In the event that NATO troops appear in the air, on land or the Black Sea, this may push the Russian field commander to take actions that will lead to the death or injury of soldiers of the North Atlantic Alliance. This would be followed by an immediate NATO response, potentially starting a cycle of escalation. The worst scenario of which could be a nuclear war,” the newspaper notes.
The authors of the magazine urged to avoid this scenario at all costs and pointed out that Western countries are now increasingly supplying Ukraine with modern weapons and intelligence data.
Yeni Şafak: Turkey will turn to NATO because of Greece's use of the S-300 against the F-16 S-300, although she assured that she uses them only in exercises (max-width: 320px) and (-webkit-min-device-pixel-ratio: 2), (max-width: 320px) and (min-resolution: 192dpi)” >
Anti-aircraft missile system S-300
Ankara intends to appeal to NATO in connection with the fact that the Greek military aimed a missile system from the S-300 system at the F-16 aircraft of the Turkish Air Force, Yeni Şafak reports, citing a high-ranking source in the Turkish Ministry of Defense.
On August 28, CNN T & uuml; rk reported, citing sources in the Turkish Ministry of Defense, that the Greek side on the island of Crete used S-300 air defense systems to capture and escort Turkish F-16 reconnaissance aircraft.
According to source Yeni Şafak, data on the incident will be discussed with Turkish colleagues in NATO and with the United States. “We are under pressure on the S-400, but Greece is actively using the S-300. When we pointed this out, we were told: “Not used, stored in hangars, used only in exercises.” But it turned out that this was not true,»,— indicated the interlocutor of the publication.
Relations between the countries have deteriorated sharply in the past few months due to a dispute over the status of the islands in the eastern Aegean, which passed to Greece following the Lausanne Treaty of 1923. The countries continued to argue about the delimitation of territorial waters and airspace, and Turkey made claims to Greece because of armaments on the islands. on which the Greek islands in the Aegean, as well as Crete, are depicted as Turkish. After that, Greek Foreign Minister Nikos Dendias said that the country fears the consequences of the rise of nationalism in Turkish society. He stressed that there were no conditions yet for improving relations with Turkey.
Greece and Turkey have been members of NATO since February 1952. However, after the conflict between the countries in Cyprus in the mid-1970s, Greece decided to withdraw from the military bloc. Then the island was divided between the predominantly Greek and Turkish population. The country again became a member of the alliance only in 1980.
Authors Tags Subscribe to Telegram
Russia still needs the security guarantees that President Vladimir Putin spoke about last year, Medvedev said. According to him, the prospect of negotiations will depend on the development of events -width: 320px) and (-webkit-min-device-pixel-ratio: 2), (max-width: 320px) and (min-resolution: 192dpi)” >
Ukraine's refusal to join NATO is not a sufficient condition for ending the military operation; this requires, among other things, an agreement on Russia's security guarantees, Deputy Chairman of the Russian Security Council Dmitry Medvedev said in an interview with the LCI TV channel.
“Refusal to participate in the North Atlantic Alliance— it is now a necessary, but no longer sufficient, condition for achieving peace. It is necessary to work out the very guarantees about which <…>President Putin spoke»,— said Medvedev (quote from Interfax).
The deputy head of the Security Council said that Russia was ready for negotiations, while the Ukrainian authorities refused them, while advocating a summit meeting. “But they were told both by the president of our country and by other participants in these negotiations that such a meeting could take place only under certain conditions,” — Medvedev recalled.
At the end of December 2021, Russia proposed to Western countries a draft security guarantee, which provided for the rejection of NATO expansion to the east and the deployment of alliance bases and weapons in the countries of the former USSR. In January, negotiations were held in Brussels with the participation of Russia, the United States and NATO on this issue, but they did not lead to anything. Washington and the North Atlantic Alliance rejected most of Russia's proposals.
On February 24, 2022, Russian President Vladimir Putin announced the start of a special operation in Ukraine. Moscow called it the goal of protecting the population of Donbass and ensuring the security of Russia in the face of a threat from NATO.
A few days after that, Russia and Ukraine began negotiations for a peaceful settlement. At a meeting of delegations from the two countries in Istanbul at the end of March, Kyiv handed over to Moscow a number of proposals, including on a non-nuclear and non-bloc status of Ukraine. Russian President Vladimir Putin called the results of the negotiations in Turkey a “breakthrough”, but later said that Kyiv began to deviate from the agreements reached, which is why the dialogue stalled.
Read on RBC Pro Pro How Amazon and Walmart are struggling with falling consumer demand sphere can turn into a serious problem for Russia Forecasts Pro “This is a stab in the back for the industry”: what IT companies suffered the most to the failures Research Pro Replacing the dollar: what lies ahead for digital currencies and why e-CNY is still ahead Articles
Negotiations finally stopped in mid-May. Moscow held the Ukrainian authorities and Western countries responsible for this. President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelensky allowed a return to negotiations, subject to the return of the territories lost by Kyiv from February 24. He also ruled out negotiations with Moscow in case of holding referendums in the territories occupied by Russia.
Authors Tags Persons
politician, ex-president, deputy head of the Security Council of Russia
September 14, 1965
The Alliance is outraged by who owns these territories
NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg recently said that increased Russian military activity in the North Atlantic and the Arctic is a challenge for the Alliance. According to him, the bloc will make efforts to combat the influence of the Russian Federation in the region in order to maintain its stability and security. Military expert Anatoly Matviychuk explained NATO's dissatisfaction with the presence of the Russian nuclear icebreaker fleet in the Arctic.
In an interview with NEWS.ru, Matviychuk noted that the latest brainchild of Rosatom – it is the only icebreaker in the world capable of carrying weapons. According to the expert, the United States has only two such vessels, one of which is broken and is in the shipyard, and the other is practically immobilized. The specialist compared the situation in the United States with a joke: “One was broken, the other was lost.” As Matviychuk noted, Stoltenberg expresses indignation, since at the moment the Arctic is the territory of the Russian Federation.
In addition, the specialist stressed that the North Atlantic has always been an arena of confrontation. According to the military expert, the fact that Russian submarines have begun loitering these waters has an “absolutely clear message”; for the US and NATO.
Matviychuk added that they could have gone somewhere in electronics further than Russia, but there are boats in the Atlantic that will not allow the transfer of troops to Europe, and a nuclear shield could also be placed there , which will be insurmountable, which is well understood in the West.
Read also: NATO Secretary General named the tasks of the Alliance in the confrontation with Russia
NATO called the experiment on placing bee hives on the territory of the headquarters and obtaining honey as part of the green initiative a success.
The first two hives appeared in April 2020, so far their number has doubled. Each hive produces between 80 and 100 kg of honey per season, some of which is left to support the life of the bees.
“Today, most of the honey produced is sold at the NATO charity bazaar in favor of supporting some local and international projects” , — the message says.
It was previously reported that Chinese scientists have learned to control the flight of a bee using electrodes in the brain.
Rate the material
Ryabkov: NATO's policy of ignoring Russia's “red lines” is extremely risky “https://s0.rbk.ru/v6_top_pics/resized/673xH/media/img/0/15/756611486472150.png 673w” media=”(max-width: 320px) and (-webkit-min-device-pixel -ratio: 2), (max-width: 320px) and (min-resolution: 192dpi)” >
The destructive course of the NATO countries to ignore the “red lines” Russia and drawing Moscow into the confrontation in Ukraine “with balancing on the brink of a direct armed conflict” is extremely risky, said in an interview with Izvestia; Deputy Foreign Minister of Russia Sergey Ryabkov.
According to him, this is fraught with further escalation up to a military clash of nuclear powers “with the ensuing dire consequences.” “This must be prevented,” — emphasized the diplomat.
Ryabkov pointed out that in modern “turbulent” conditions, nuclear risks are very significant, so they cannot be underestimated or artificially “inflated”. “We consider one of the most important tasks in this context to be the preservation of the nuclear “five” by all countries. (Russia, USA, China, Great Britain and France — RBC.) adherence to the postulate of the inadmissibility of any war between countries possessing nuclear weapons»,— he concluded.
A few months before the start of the special operation in Ukraine, Moscow sent proposals for security guarantees to the United States and NATO countries. They proposed that the alliance abandon expansion to the east, including at the expense of Ukraine, not deploy military bases in the post-Soviet space and introduce mutual arms restrictions.
In January 2022, Russia, the United States and NATO held a series of consultations on the issue of security guarantees, but this did not lead to results. The United States called it impossible for NATO to refuse to accept new members, as this is contrary to the “open door” policy.
Later, President Vladimir Putin, speaking about the decision to start a special operation in Ukraine, stated that “Russia cannot feel safe, exist with a constant threat emanating from the territory of modern Ukraine.” He explained that we are talking about expanding to the east and bringing NATO infrastructure closer to the Russian borders.
Read on RBC Pro Pro How brands go to the point of absurdity in texts about themselves Instructions Pro Russian maybe: how the risk management of the largest companies in Russia has changed from parents and earned $ 1 billion Articles Pro How hard the sanctions hit the goods market 18+ Articles Pro How governments around the world withdraw super profits from oilmen Articles Pro What do they buy in the summer on Wildberries and who sells the most. Rating Research Pro The main thing is not to reach Abibas: what should be the import-substituting brand therefore, in this sense, [NATO] expansion at the expense of these countries does not pose an immediate threat.” “But the expansion of military infrastructure in the territory of this region will certainly cause our response,” — the President added.
Authors Tags Subscribe to Telegram
At 03:45, the Ukrainian military fired ten shells with a caliber of 155 mm in the Budennovsky and Leninsky districts of Donetsk, reported on Monday, 22 August, in the Telegram channel of the JCCC office in the DPR.
Russia continues its special operation in Ukraine. On the eve of the Russian Ministry of Defense accused Ukraine of poisoning the Russian military in the Zaporozhye region with botulinum toxin type “B”.
The air defense system in Crimea worked several times. And in Sevastopol, a downed drone fell on the roof of the headquarters of the Black Sea Fleet.
An explosion occurred near the zoo of Mariupol, which was supposed to be visited by the pro-Russian head of the city.
Read online here.
Scholz, before the special operation, told Putin that Ukraine would not join NATO in the next 30 years, Scholz said that during a conversation with Putin before the start of hostilities in Ukraine, he assured the Russian president that NATO did not pose a threat to Moscow, and Kyiv's entry into the alliance ” won't happen in the next 30 years”
Western analysts called Romania's Black Sea coast NATO's weakest point. Bloomberg writes about this.
Strengthening the borders on the eastern border of the North Atlantic Alliance, as noted in the publication, is now one of the main priorities for containing Russia.
According to analysts, the Black Sea serves for the Russian Federation, a gateway to the Mediterranean and is an important point for “projecting influence on the countries of the Middle East and Africa.”
“Moscow gives priority to South-Eastern Europe,” said analyst Matthew Orr. This, in his opinion, shows how “the Russians are concerned about this region and want to have a strong military presence there.”
Because of this, NATO is forced, according to Orr, to respond accordingly.
Bloomberg emphasizes that just a few weeks after the start of Russia's NMD in Ukraine, at a summit in Brussels, the alliance agreed to create four new battlegroups for Romania, Hungary, Bulgaria and Slovakia. And this is in addition to the previous four already deployed in Poland and the Baltic countries.
Romania, as reported in the material, even before the start of the JMD hosted about a thousand soldiers, mostly NATO troops. But after February 24, the Allies in the North Atlantic Alliance significantly increased their presence, deploying more troops, aircraft and ships in the specified Eastern European borders.
US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken announced in his microblog on Twitter that a package of documents on Washington's ratification of Finland and Sweden's accession to the alliance.
“I handed over … to the North Atlantic Treaty Depositary the US instruments of ratification as the last step in the process of ratifying Finland and Sweden's accession to NATO,” he wrote.
The Russian Foreign Ministry assessed the possibility of a direct clash with the United States and NATO
Russia is not interested in a direct clash with the United States and NATO countries, said Ivan Nechaev, Deputy Director of the Information and Press Department of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
“Our Armed Forces are equipped with modern and high-precision conventional (non-nuclear. — RBC) weapons, which allow us to fully implement the goals and tasks set by the President of Russia for the purposes of the NMD in Ukraine. Russia, as a nuclear power, will continue to act as responsibly as possible, a direct clash with the United States and NATO is not in our interests, — he said.
Nechaev stressed that “Russia has never saber-rattled, let alone nuclear.” At the same time, according to him, due to the supply of the “regime in Kyiv” clashes between Russia and the forces of the collective West are quite real.
Russia announced the start of a military special operation in Ukraine on the morning of February 24th. President Vladimir Putin called its goals the denazization and demilitarization of the neighboring country, as well as the protection of the population of Donbass from “genocide”; from Kyiv. Ukraine, in response, severed diplomatic relations with Moscow and declared martial law.
Against the backdrop of a special operation, the heads of state— members of the North Atlantic Alliance at the end of June adopted a new NATO strategic concept, in which Russia is called the most significant and direct threat to the security of the bloc. At the same time, the document notes that the alliance does not seek confrontation and does not pose a threat to Russia, and is also ready to keep channels of communication with Moscow open, despite the fact that it no longer considers it a partner.
This is not the first time the Russian leadership has accused NATO of an aggressive policy towards Moscow. In particular, the first deputy head of the presidential administration, Sergei Kiriyenko, said that the bloc was conducting a “hot military operation”; against Russia on the territory of Ukraine. Putin called the expansion of NATO to the East one of the reasons for holding the NWO in Ukraine.
Read on RBC Pro Pro Will investors be able to make money on people's desire to hide on the Web? or goods that are stuck in Europe Instructions Pro Russian maybe: how the risk management of the largest companies in Russia has changed Articles Pro “I left the boss humiliated”: how to deal with toxicity at work inaction: what happens to us in a dream quality of your life
Until the end of February, military equipment produced by NATO countries accounted for less than a percent of the entire Ukrainian army. However, in six months its share has increased tenfold. What the Ukrainian army is armed with – RBC figured out
NATO claims global dominance, Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu said at the Army-2022 forum, RIA Novosti reports.
“NATO has dropped its masks. The aggressive nature of the bloc was no longer hidden behind formulations about the exclusively defensive orientation of coalition activities. Today, the alliance's strategic planning documents contain claims for global dominance,— said the head of the Ministry of Defense.
At the end of June, the heads of state— members of the North Atlantic Alliance adopted a new strategic concept of NATO, in which Russia is called the most significant and direct threat to the security of the bloc. At the same time, the document notes that the alliance does not seek confrontation and does not pose a threat to Russia, and is also ready to keep channels of communication with Moscow open, despite the fact that it no longer considers it a partner.
The Russian leadership is not the first time accuses NATO of an aggressive policy towards Moscow. In particular, the first deputy head of the presidential administration, Sergei Kiriyenko, said that the bloc was conducting a “hot military operation”; against Russia on the territory of Ukraine.
Relations between Russia and the alliance deteriorated sharply after the start of a special military operation in Ukraine. NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg called the Russian military actions “the most dangerous situation in Europe since the Second World War” and urged not to allow Moscow's policy to be successful.
Read on RBC Pro Pro Russian management is dominated by a “culture of order”. What It Leads To Pro How To How Wealthy Russians Influenced Dubai Property Market In 2022 Pro Predictions Unreliable GDP: Why We're Getting The Economy Wrong Pro Articles What Not To Tell About Your Kids At Job Interviews Pro How To Five Exercises For Good Posture Pro How To Pay How Much To Pay to an IT specialist and from which specialists to assemble a basic team Instructions Pro Russian maybe: how the risk management of the largest companies in Russia has changed Articles Pro A third of Russians receive either black or gray wages. What they risk Articles
At the same time, as the head of the Pentagon, Lloyd Austin, said, NATO does not seek confrontation with Russia and does not serve as a threat to it.
The Kremlin responded that the threat to Europe was the expansion NATO infrastructure to the east and the change of power in Ukraine. According to the press secretary of the President Dmitry Peskov, the current situation in Europe “was provoked by NATO's aggressive attack”, and the wave-like approach of the alliance to the Russian borders created a danger.
Tags Subscribe to VK RBC Get news faster than anyone
Washington Post: Baltic and Eastern European countries are asking the United States to expedite the supply of weapons to them So, Estonia wants to receive MLRS HIMARS and Reaper attack drones, and Poland is waiting for ordered anti-aircraft missile systems Patriot, HIMARS, F-16 fighters and Abrams tanks
Eastern flank countries NATO is demanding more troops and more weapons to contain Russia, writes The Washington Post.
About 100,000 US troops are stationed across Europe, but the “more vulnerable” US allies consider this insufficient, the newspaper notes.
The Baltic and Eastern European countries are asking the United States to increase defense production to speed up the implementation of orders for weapons.
«HIMARS [US multiple launch rocket systems], Reaper [attack drones], counter-battery radars— this is what we will need most in terms of the lethal combat power that will inevitably be required to contain Russia, — Estonian Defense Ministry Chancellor Kusti Salm said in an interview with the newspaper.
At the same time, Polish officials believe that the defense of the republic would be helped if the United States accelerated the supply of weapons that had already been promised to Warsaw. Poland is expecting US Patriot, HIMARS, F-16 fighter jets and Abrams tanks.
Meanwhile, Latvian Defense Minister Artis Pabriks told reporters that his country wants modern long-range rocket artillery as well as air defense systems. and coastal defense, which are usually not available to countries with a modest budget.
Read on RBC Pro Pro “Let's start tomorrow”: how to help a procrastinator speed up Instructions Pro How to get money from the sale of real estate in Russia while abroad Instructions Pro “The subtle art of giving a damn”: how to stop following imposed goals Summary Pro “Mom, why are we like this poor?”: how to answer uncomfortable questions from children Pro instructions “We just got canceled”: how Russian companies are being canceled in the West Pro articles Who are inverse paranoids and why they succeed Articles Pro The most important tax amendments that will appear in the fall of 2022 Articles
At the end of June, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg announced that the bloc was going to increase the rapid reaction force from 40,000 to 300,000 by 2023. At the same time, noted the coordinator for strategic communications of the National Security Council (NSC) John Kirby, Russia has no reason to consider the buildup of NATO troops on the eastern flank as a provocation. The NATO countries in the new Strategic Concept recognized Russia as “the most serious and direct threat to the security of NATO members and peace and stability in the Euro-Atlantic region.” The bloc will continue to counter the “Russian threats”, its “irresponsible rhetoric” and respond to “her hostile actions.”
In the spring, the US announced plans to deploy two Patriot batteries to Poland “in a proactive manner to counter any potential threats to the US, allied forces, and NATO territory.” The batteries will be transferred under Article 5 on NATO collective defense (which means that an attack on one of the NATO members will be considered an attack on all NATO members).
At the end of July, Pentagon departmental publication Stars and Stripes wrote that the United States was going to send fifth-generation Boeing F-22 Raptor fighters to Poland in support of NATO's mission to air cover the alliance's eastern flank. They will be stationed at the 32nd Tactical Air Base near the Polish city of Lask.
This week, the US mission to NATO announced that members of the US Army's elite 101st Airborne Division, known as the “Screaming Eagles”, will be transferred to Europe to strengthen the eastern flank.
The Kremlin noted that the “romantic period” in relations with NATO was replaced by everyday work. “Working days, so to speak, routine relations, lie in the fact that NATO, as it was created and conceived as an instrument of confrontation, it still performs these functions. NATO cannot perform any other functions simply by its very nature. That's how we treated NATO, that's how we treat NATO,” — said the press secretary of the President of Russia Dmitry Peskov.
Turkish Foreign Minister Cavusoglu: Sweden and Finland did not fulfill their promises to join NATO Turkey has not seen Sweden and Finland take steps to extradite the Kurds, the Foreign Minister said. Swedish SVT writes that Stockholm is ready to extradite one of them. Turkey promises in return to approve the entry of these countries into NATO media=”(max-width: 320px) and (-webkit-min-device-pixel-ratio: 2), (max-width: 320px) and (min-resolution: 192dpi)” >
Sweden and Finland have not yet fulfilled the demands made by Ankara to join NATO, Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu said at a press conference, quoted by the Turkish Anadolu agency.
The Minister recalled the agreement that Ankara has concluded with Helsinki and Stockholm. According to him, they must extradite members of the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK), which it considers terrorist, to Turkey, close all organizations associated with its structures, and give guarantees to Ankara. Turkey, for its part, undertook not to impede the entry of these countries into NATO. However, the Turkish side has not yet seen Sweden and Finland take any steps in this direction, he said.
For a state to join NATO, it must be approved by all other current members of the organization. However, Turkey has stated that it will prevent this until Helsinki and Stockholm comply with its demands.
Diplomat Belousov: NATO can be expected to justify any use of nuclear weapons The United States “reserved the opportunity” to use nuclear weapons “at any moment, for any reason and against any state” under the pretext of threatening their interests or their allies, Andrei Belousov believes
NATO countries in the future can be expected to justify any use of nuclear weapons, says Andrei Belousov, deputy head of the Russian delegation to the 10th Review Conference of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT). His words are quoted on the website of the Permanent Mission
of Russia to the UN.
“By the way, there is every reason for such a conclusion. The doctrinal documents of the United States prescribe the use of nuclear weapons under the pretext of threatening their own vital interests or those of their allies, — Belousov pointed out.
Thus, the United States “reserved the opportunity” use nuclear weapons “at any moment, for any reason and against any state”; under this pretext, the diplomat noted.
“And this is the real threat of a nuclear war. Especially considering that the United States remains the only state that has put its nuclear arsenal into practice,— he added.
US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken said that his country could use nuclear weapons “only under extraordinary circumstances, to protect the vital interests of the United States, allies and partners.”
In early March, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov called the deployment of American nuclear weapons on the territory of European countries unacceptable. According to him, this is contrary to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. Lavrov also noted that “the vicious practice of joint nuclear missions with the participation of non-nuclear NATO countries persists.” Thus, the possibility of a nuclear strike on Russia is being worked out, the minister argued. “It's high time to bring American nuclear weapons home, and the associated infrastructure in Europe to be completely eliminated,” — he said.
Read on RBC Pro Pro Why there are no such bright logos in Europe as Coca-Cola Articles Pro What does the Swiss tax system offer to Russian businessmen: an overview Articles Pro Common Decision Making Mistakes Articles Pro “You're just a cog”: what it's like to work at Microsoft – in 5 points Pro articles Due to what phrases and attitudes of parents children will not be able to become leaders Pro Employees at a distance began to work worse: how to ethically control them Instructions Authors Tags Subscribe to RuTube RBC Live broadcasts, videos and recordings of programs on our RuTube channel
Ministry of Defense: an arsenal with 45 thousand tons of NATO ammunition was destroyed in the Nikolaev region “image/webp” media=”(max-width: 320px) and (min-resolution: 192dpi)” >
Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
Near the city of Voznesensk, Mykolaiv region of Ukraine, a warehouse was destroyed, which stored 45,000 tons of ammunition supplied by NATO countries for the Armed Forces of Ukraine, the Russian Ministry of Defense reported.
In addition, Russian aviation, rocket troops and artillery attacked three command posts of Ukrainian forces in the DPR, as well as troops and equipment of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in 173 districts. The launcher of the Buk-M1 air defense system, five ammunition depots were destroyed.
At the request of Roskomnadzor, RBC provides data on the details of the military operation in Ukraine based on information from Russian official sources.
Earlier, the Ministry of Defense reported on the seizure of weapons in the Izyum direction, including foreign ones. The department published a video with captured weapons. Among them— weapons manufactured in the UK, USA, Poland, Sweden, including Javelin man-portable anti-tank missile systems and Carl Gustaf machine guns, as well as heavy machine guns and Soviet-made small arms abandoned by the Ukrainian military.
Tags RBC Comfort
Mailing from news that
affects the quality of your life
Thus, the US added to the list of more than 20 countries whose legislature ratified documents on NATO expansion. For Finland and Sweden to join the bloc, the consent of all 30 members of the alliance is required image/webp” media=”(max-width: 320px) and (min-resolution: 192dpi)” >
The US Senate approved a resolution to ratify the protocols on accession of Finland and Sweden to NATO, Reuters reports.
According to the agency, “for” the accession of countries to the military alliance voted 83 senators, “against”— one.
Thus, the resolution was adopted by a majority of the 67 required votes, and the United States added to the list of more than 20 countries whose legislatures ratified documents on NATO expansion. To join the NATO bloc, Sweden and Finland need to all 30 member countries of the alliance have ratified the corresponding agreement.
Finland and Sweden applied to join NATO in May this year. The countries emphasized that the decision is related to the Russian military operations in Ukraine, however, it is not directed against Moscow and is due to the “changed security situation”.
According to the application procedure, everyone must approve NATO members, but Turkey opposed. She demanded that the countries extradite members of the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK), which Turkey considers a terrorist organization, to Ankara, close all organizations associated with the PKK structures, and provide Turkey with guarantees.
Nevertheless, already at the end of June, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan met with Finnish President Sauli Niinistö and Swedish Prime Minister Magdalena Andersson. The parties were able to agree on the issue of countries joining NATO, and Ankara agreed to support the candidates. Erdogan subsequently stated that parliament would only ratify their applications after they fulfilled their promises to Ankara.
In early July, Erdogan again stressed that Turkey would return to its original position regarding the membership of Sweden and Finland in the alliance if it sees “attempts to delay the implementation of the commitments made or hypocrisy.”
At the same time, Swedish Foreign Minister Ann Linde called exaggerated fears that Ankara could again block countries from joining the alliance. “I think we've worked so hard on this that we don't have to worry too much about further problems coming up. But it would be unreasonable of me to say that nothing will come up at all,— she said.
Read on RBC Pro Pro Anti-sanctions “plastic”: where is it better to get an international card can’t hold back the rise in prices »: how to stop following imposed goals Summary Pro I have low blood pressure. Is this normal or should I call an ambulance? Instructions Authors Tags How does this concern you?
Explained in the evening newsletter
The press service of the United States veterans association Concerned Veterans for America published an appeal to the US Senate in which veterans urged parliamentarians to disapprove of NATO expansion to include Sweden and Finland.
CVA Senior Adviser Dan Caldwell recalled that the US is currently saddled with $30 trillion in public debt, record inflation and growing limits on military capabilities .
“The last thing we need to do now is — it is to extend security guarantees through NATO to two more rich European states … The main attention must be paid to domestic needs and security,” he stressed.
A Balkan volunteer told why he is fighting for the DPR
The more time you spend in Donbas, the more you realize how many interesting people who are not indifferent to its fate are attracted to this region. A few days ago, I had the opportunity to meet a native of the Congo, who is participating in a special military operation in the ranks of the Chechen unit “Akhmat”. And here is a new acquaintance. Platoon commander of the infantry battalion of the operational group “Delta” of the People's Militia of the LPR with the call sign “Serb”.
As you might guess, the call sign of the serviceman was not chosen by chance. The man is indeed from Serbia. At the end of 2014, he came as a volunteer to the Donbass and after eight years, as the military himself admits, this land and its people became dear to him.
When asked why a citizen of another country suddenly had a desire to stand on defense of Donbass, “Serb” answers what motivated him first of all by the desire to help the Slav brothers:
– Here in 2014 there was not just a civil war, it was a clash of two large countries. And one of them, I'm talking about Ukraine now, just started killing defenseless people…
According to the “Serb”, he already saw everything that was happening in the Donbass in his country in 1999, when people sat under carpet bombing for 90 days.
– The United States and NATO countries killed our children, women, old people. It shouldn’t be like this.
It was this parallel with the suffering experienced from one’s own experience that became the key moment for making a decision, perhaps strange in the eyes of others, the interlocutor shares.
The Serb admits that he had no military training, let alone combat experience, until 2014.
– I didn't even know how to assemble or disassemble a machine gun. I learned everything here when I came. The mentors were good, real experts. Thanks to them.
– My military path began with Debaltseve, then served and settled in the Luhansk People's Republic. During the special operation, he took part in the assault on the city of Svetlodarsk, where our troops broke through the enemy's defenses. Unfortunately, then we lost the battalion commander and the company commander. They came under fire from the Ukrainian armed forces. It was a huge loss, but we still reached Svetlodarsk.
According to the interlocutor, it was the most difficult battle since the start of the special operation.
He says that if we compare the enemy, who was eight years ago, and the one that is now, the difference is visible to the naked eye.
– They began to work very smoothly. This has never happened before.
– Recently, our unit has liberated the Uglegorsk TPP, we are moving forward according to plan.
The assault on the thermal power plant, according to “Serb”, was indeed a very difficult task. The fortifications, pillboxes and dugouts, equipped by the Ukrainian military, were filled with concrete and practically looked like an impregnable fortress.
– But we have excellent artillery, – the military man says not without pride. – The guys worked very professionally. About two thousand shells were fired at the approaches to the station.
According to the “Serb”, if it were not for the support of artillery, the assault on the TPP could hardly have been successful. And most likely, it would have dragged on for a long time.
– The enemy artillery worked without interruption. We would not have been able to simply enter the open field with all our desire.
According to the serviceman, the TPP was a very significant strategic point. After all, it can “power up” the entire Donbass with electricity.
– No. My home is here. During this time, I have already become a citizen of the Russian Federation, and I am going to stay in the Donbass.
“For the forces of the Alliance, the repetition of past events is a scripted operation”
The night from July 31 to August 1 was marked for the Balkan Peninsula by a new round of tension between Serbia and self-proclaimed Kosovo. One of the main reasons is the refusal of the Pristina authorities to accept Serbian documents and the issuance of a temporary permit to enter the Kosovo territory.
The approach of the day when Serbian license plates will no longer be recognized on the territory of Kosovo caused a wave of protests among the population. The Serbs living in the region again began to feel discrimination from the authorities of Pristina. The Kosovo police announced the closure of the checkpoint and the bridge between Serbia and the partially recognized republic.
This escalation is no surprise to anyone. According to experts, nothing much is happening now, and any new round of tension in the region is perceived as an ordinary situation that occurs once a year for the past five years.
According to Alexander Pivovarenko, senior researcher at the Institute of Slavic Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, interest in new escalations arises from the growing military component of conflicts.
– There are more and more cases of mobilization of troops, that is, the pulling of the army to the borders. Therefore, each new escalation increases the risk of an armed conflict. The parties have little interest in this, but the risks objectively increase.
The situation is really ordinary. The events of September 2021, when the Kosovo authorities required Serbs living there to issue temporary Kosovo license plates, are similar to the current ones. The actions of Pristina then led to violent clashes between the police and Serbs entering the territory with Belgrade license plates. The situation escalated until weaning not only private cars, but also special ones. The help of Russia, which sent Pantsir complexes to Belgrade, extinguished the situation and brought life in the region to relative normality.
The viscosity of the conflict, however, has not disappeared. The events of last night showed that neither Pristina nor Belgrade will stop at peace agreements if the situation starts to get out of control. Yes, and the flair of the events of 23 years ago, which was frighteningly similar to the situation last night, is present.
As noted by Serbian publications, bells rang continuously in all churches and monasteries of Northern Kosovo, just like in 1999 before the bombing Yugoslavia.
NATO's interest in Pristina is also confirmed by experts. However, a repetition of the events of the late nineties is hardly to be expected. The escalation of the conflict, according to Alexander Pivovarenko, will lead to a scenario of punishing Serbia.
– For NATO forces, the repetition of past events – operation with a pre-written script. It should be noted that back in January 2021, in the foreign expert press, Serbia was called the culprit of a possible conflict in the Balkans, in Bosnia or Kosovo, the expert comments. – No matter where, but the culprit has already been identified. Now Serbia is also accused of its diplomatic position of cooperation with Russia, which, as it were, violates European discipline. Therefore, such an action would increase the viability of NATO and show that the bloc is capable of dealing with challenges. But this would lead to some kind of coercion of Belgrade.
The Serbian authorities understand this prospect, so there is no interest in escalation. The current tension does not come from Serbia, but Belgrade is forced to respond to the actions of Pristina. The world community should not be afraid of a large-scale armed clash, taking into account Pristina's delay in adopting the rule for replacing Serbian license plates with Kosovo ones, for the time being. According to expert assessment, such a scenario is possible if events at the border itself or somewhere else go according to a bad scenario. The appearance of victims, even by chance, will lead to irreversible events, and in the end Serbia will be declared the culprit, no matter what happens.
Based on such a scenario, the position of Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić is understandable, who, in an address to nation said that “Serbia will pray for peace, but if the persecution continues, Serbia will win.”
Recall that the autonomous province of Kosovo and Metohija declared independence from Serbia in February 2008. To date, 98 states have recognized Kosovo's independence. The remaining states did not recognize or remained neutral regarding the independence of the republic. The Serbian government considers Kosovo its territory. In 2013, the process of normalizing relations with the government of Kosovo began, but all steps remain ineffective.
Alarm sirens sound in Kosovo, citizens prepare barricades: eyewitness videos
Watch related videos
Russian Foreign Ministry: a number of NATO countries support the recruitment of foreigners for the Ukrainian army /webp” media=”(max-width: 320px) and (min-resolution: 192dpi)” >
A number of NATO countries tacitly support Kyiv's actions to recruit foreign citizens to participate in hostilities in the Donbass, said in an interview with RIA Novosti Director of the Department of New Challenges and Threats of the Russian Foreign Ministry Vladimir Tarabrin.
“The Russian Federation is closely monitoring the recruitment of foreign citizens carried out by the Ukrainian authorities with the tacit support of certain NATO countries to conduct military operations in eastern Ukraine on the side of the Kyiv regime”,&mdash ; said the diplomat.
He also stressed that not only non-governmental organizations are involved in the recruitment process, but also Ukrainian diplomatic missions abroad, which contradicts a number of international agreements, in particular, the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations of 1961.
Russia conducts a special operation on “demilitarization and denazification” Ukraine since February 24. Shortly after the outbreak of hostilities, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky announced the creation of an international territorial defense legion from foreign volunteers. The Russian Ministry of Defense calls them mercenaries and does not consider them combatants.
In mid-July, the Russian Ministry of Defense announced that since the start of the military operation, 7,107 mercenaries had arrived in Ukraine, most of them from Poland. 4366 fighters were destroyed or left the combat zone, 2741 continue to participate in the conflict, the department claimed.
Read on RBC Pro Pro Berries, lettuce and wine: what to eat to improve memory and thinking Instructions Pro “Homeless” billionaire: how Ethereum creator Vitalik Buterin lives Articles Pro “I'm like a ninja in a street fight”: Ray Dalio – on the impact of meditation Articles Pro x The Economist Is China facing an energy crisis – The Economist Articles Pro Parallel Import of Technology: What's Wrong “Cross of Death” What is it and why is it dangerous?
Newsweek: Moscow is preparing an unpleasant surprise for NATO in the form of a change in the status quo
“Iskander” complex, screen video. source: social networks
The Russian Federation may present NATO with an “unpleasant surprise”, according to the American edition of Newsweek.
The grounds for such a forecast appeared against the backdrop of a NATO report on the progress of the special operation in Ukraine.
The publication writes that “some features and “surprises” of the Russian army in Ukraine” – such as “deployment of older and less accurate weapons systems”, “limited use of aviation”, as well as “restrained attacks in cyberspace”, can be explained by the preservation of “the ability to participate and in operations against NATO.
At the same time, Western analysts believe that Russia can change its status quo, despite its commitment to a defensive strategy.
In July, NATO officially recognized the Russian Federation as its the main threat. According to the new concept of the alliance, Russia's goal is to destabilize states to the east and south of NATO member countries.
“This is not an end, but a good beginning”
The trilateral memorandum recently signed at the NATO summit between Turkey, Sweden and Finland is “not an end, but a good start,” said Turkish Defense Minister Hulusi Akar.
“We expect them to live up to their commitments,” said aspirants to join the North Atlantic Alliance of Sweden and Finland Hulusi Akar at a press conference with his Latvian counterpart Artis Pabriks in Riga, where they discussed defense and cooperation with NATO.
During the NATO summit in Madrid late last month, the leaders of the three countries agreed on a trilateral memorandum to address Turkey's legitimate security concerns, paving the way for Finland and Sweden to apply for NATO membership, according to the Turkish Daily Sabah.
The agreement stipulates that Stockholm and Helsinki will not support the Kurdish group YPG, which Ankara calls the Syrian offshoot of the PKK, and the Gülenist movement FETÖ, which the Turkish authorities blame for the failed 2016 coup attempt.
Turkey , a member of NATO for more than 70 years, pushed Sweden and Finland to fulfill their obligations.
The Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK) has been designated a terrorist organization by Turkey, the European Union and the United States and is blamed for the deaths of 40,000 man.
Regarding the Joint Coordinating Center in Istanbul to supervise the export of Ukrainian grain, Hulusi Akar said: “The center is working. Representatives of Turkey, the UN, Ukraine and Russia are working day and night to ensure that ships waiting in Ukrainian ports begin transporting grain. in the coming hours and days.”
Turkey continues its efforts to achieve a ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine and ensure the delivery of humanitarian aid, he said.
The joint center was officially opened on Wednesday, with the participation of representatives from Turkey, the United Nations, Russia and Ukraine, to ensure the safe transportation of commercial food and fertilizers by merchant ships from three key Ukrainian ports in the Black Sea.
Last week Turkey, the United Nations, Russia and Ukraine have signed an agreement to open three Ukrainian ports – Odessa, Chornomorsk and Yuzhny – for grain stuck for several months due to the ongoing Ukrainian conflict.
Following last week's breakthrough grain export deal, Turkey's foreign minister also said earlier in the day that “the time has come to focus on a truce” between Russia and Ukraine.
Speaking at a joint news conference with Georgian Foreign Minister Ilya Darchiashvili, Mevlut Cavusoglu praised the grain export agreement signed in Istanbul last Friday, saying that the obstacles “for the export of not only Ukrainian grain, but also Russian grain and fertilizers” have been removed, helping to feed a hungry world.
During the talks in Istanbul, the parties agreed to establish a coordination center to conduct joint inspections at the entrances and exits of harbors and ensure the safety of routes.
Turkey agreed with Moscow and Kyiv on a corridor from the Ukrainian port city of Odessa to resume global supplies grain, recalls the Daily Sabah. Expressing hope that the deal will be implemented without any hiccups or problems, Turkish Foreign Minister Cavusoglu said that the grain and wheat could then be delivered to those countries that are in dire need of them. If the deal is successfully implemented, he added, “it could really build confidence between Russia and Ukraine.”
“Now it's time to focus on a ceasefire. This is not just a process that should be carried out at the level of foreign ministers,” he added, declaring Turkey’s readiness to accept and mediate negotiations between Russia and Ukraine to achieve a lasting peace.
“As Turkey, we we will continue our efforts so that the parties return to the negotiating table as soon as possible,” he added.