United States

now browsing by tag


Iran and the United States are ready to resume negotiations on the lifting of sanctions

The stalemate between Tehran and Washington on the nuclear deal has broken its stalemate

The stalled talks on the Iran-US nuclear deal may soon resume. The head of the EU foreign policy department said that the stalemate was broken after a meeting with the foreign minister of the Islamic Republic in Tehran. The topic of lifting sanctions against Iran is becoming relevant again.

Photo: AP

Josep Borrell, EU foreign policy chief, said that negotiations on a nuclear deal with Iran will resume, which will prevent a complete failure of the agreement, which could provoke a nuclear arms race in the Middle East.

According to The Guardian, after meeting with Iranian Foreign Minister Hossein Amir-Abdollahian in Tehran, Borrell said the deadlock that had stalled talks on resuming the nuclear deal since March had broken. Borrell did not give details on the exact date for the resumption of talks or the exact format, but said the process took place with the consent of Iran and the US. He also met with Iranian national security chief Ali Shamkhani.

Previous talks have floundered, although most aspects of the US return to the nuclear deal have been settled. However, US President Joe Biden was unwilling to accept Iran's demand to lift sanctions on the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) by ending its status as a “foreign terrorist organization”.

At a joint press conference in Tehran, Amir-Abdollahian said: “We are ready to resume negotiations in Vienna in the coming days.”

The Iranian minister expressed hope that the US “this time” will adhere to a “realistic and fair approach”; and give Iran the full economic benefits of the 2015 nuclear deal, known as the Joint Comprehensive Program of Action (JCPOA). In 2018, Donald Trump announced that he would impose the “highest level of economic sanctions” ever. against Iran and withdrew the US from the international agreement on the nuclear deal.

The Iranian foreign minister said he had conducted “detailed, precise and profound” talks with Borrell about negotiations to revive the JCPOA, adding: “We are going to break the deadlock in the Vienna talks and put an end to the tensions that have existed in recent days.” the UN inspectorate has lost almost all effective access to Iran's nuclear facilities. Tehran reacted to a vote of no confidence earlier this month by the board of the International Atomic Energy Agency by shutting down some cameras at its facilities, undermining “continuity of knowledge”; UN on Iran's nuclear activities.

Many regional observers remain doubtful that a deal will be reached, but the conflict in Ukraine did not provide Tehran with unexpected economic benefits, as Russia offered its oil to China at a reduced price, crowding out Iran from key markets, writes The Guardian. According to Hamid Hosseini, President of the Oil and Gas Exporters Union of Iran, Iran's oil exports to China fell by 34% as of May.

Источник www.mk.ru

NYT learned about the work of the “network of commandos and spies” of the United States in Ukraine

According to the newspaper, CIA officers are secretly working in Ukraine, collecting intelligence, which the US authorities then pass on to Kyiv. Washington's allied commandos are also operating in the country, according to its sources

Ukraine is helped by a “network of commandos (special forces” RBC) and spies” The United States and other NATO countries, they operate both in Ukraine and abroad, writes The New York Times, citing American and European officials.

According to her, in the country, mainly in Kyiv, secretly operate CIA officers who collect intelligence. Washington then shares them with the Ukrainian authorities.

Also in Ukraine are special forces from other NATO countries, including the UK, France, Canada and Lithuania, writes NYT. “The United States withdrew its 150 military instructors prior to the outbreak of war in February, but these allied commandos either remained or have since moved in and out of the country, training and advising Ukrainian troops, providing a land channel for arms supplies and other assistance.” ..>»,— notes the publication with reference to three US officials.

The commandos are not on the front line, but advise the Ukrainian military remotely from headquarters, including passing intelligence, writes the NYT.

However, most of the work is carried out outside Ukraine, including at military bases in Germany, France and Great Britain.

After the start of the Russian military operation in Ukraine, the 10th Special Operations Group of the US Army created a coalition to coordinate assistance to the Ukrainian military. Now it includes 20 countries, the coalition operates in Germany.

Read on RBC Pro Pro Why the fashion for educational startups ends with the pandemic Articles Pro The world predicts the stagnation of the IT industry. What awaits her in Russia – two trends Pro Forecasts Stop cluttering up the warehouse: we build a purchasing system in six steps Pro instructions Live to 120: why the co-founder of PayPal takes growth hormone Housing is falling all over the world. Will the 2008 crisis repeat Articles Pro Tax disputes: what to pay attention to right now Case studies Pro Second after Microsoft: why Oracle is on the rise despite the recession and equipment to Ukraine. “Another thing we can help with is intelligence on where the threats to these convoys might come from,” Wormouth clarified.

The NYT wrote about the actions of the CIA station in Ukraine in February, before the start of the operation. The newspaper, in particular, reported that the US authorities temporarily transferred intelligence officers from Kyiv to Lviv due to the “build-up of Russian military power near Ukraine.”

In early May, the publication reported that the United States had transferred intelligence to Ukraine, which were used to strike at the Russian military.

President Joe Biden then demanded to stop leaking information about the exchange of data between the intelligence services of the United States and Ukraine.

Authors Tags Subscribe to RuTube RBC Live broadcasts, videos and recordings of programs on our RuTube channel

Источник rbc.ru

In the United States, dozens of people were detained at protests against the decision to ban abortion

At least 25 people were detained in New York during a protest against the decision of the Supreme Court to abolish the right to abortion.

According to the New York Post, they took to the streets about 17 thousand people. Many carried placards and also chanted “My Body – my choice.

ABC7 TV channel reports that in Los Angeles there were clashes between the police and protesters who threw pyrotechnics and other objects at law enforcement officers. Dozens of people have been detained. In Arizona, the police had to use tear gas to disperse the crowd.

The right to abortion has been in effect in the United States since 1973. On the eve of the Supreme Court of the country overturned this decision and thus gave the opportunity to individual states to make their own rules. Nearly half of the 50 states now plan to ban or significantly restrict abortion in their territories.

President Joe Biden condemned the decision, saying it “sets America back 150 years.”

Rate the material

Источник aif.ru

In the United States compared the reception of refugees from Ukraine and from Afghanistan

In summer, the number of Ukrainians who moved to the United States will reach 100,000

This summer, the United States promises to accept 100,000 Ukrainian refugees. Since the beginning of March, at least 71,000 people from Ukraine have already entered the States, fleeing the conflict in their homeland. Meanwhile, despite the loud promises of the White House, human rights activists criticize the actions of the Biden administration to receive migrants.

Smaller At least 71,000 Ukrainians have arrived in the US since March, and President Biden has promised to take in 100,000 people, writes The Guardian.

To date, more than 15,000 Ukrainians have entered the US after being approved for sponsorship under the Unity for Ukraine program, according to data from the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) provided to NBC. Another 23,000 people have been approved but have not yet made the journey; the organization of trips depends on the Ukrainians or their sponsors.

Since the program launched in April, donors including friends, family, non-governmental organizations and church groups have submitted online applications to support more than 60,000 Ukrainians wishing to enter the United States. There are about 1,400 new online sponsorship applications for individual Ukrainians, according to the Washington Post.

In recent years, the US has become an increasingly hostile environment for many migrants and refugees, but Ukrainians are mostly welcomed without controversy, notes The Guardian .

According to the UN, at least 12 million Ukrainians have been displaced due to the conflict in their country. Of these, almost 5.3 million have taken refuge in European countries, including 1.8 million in the Russian Federation, 1.2 million in Poland, 780,000 in Germany and 120,000 in Spain. About 7 million Ukrainians are considered internally displaced.

With such a huge number of refugees, The Guardian notes, the Biden administration is likely to face pressure to raise the ceiling for Ukrainians allowed into the US.


While the number of Ukrainians arriving through the Citizen Sponsorship Scheme is growing, most of those who have made it to the United States to date have arrived on valid visas or have crossed the border between Mexico and the United States in the south.

At the southern border, nearly 24,000 Ukrainians crossed the U.S. border at land crossings such as Tijuana from March to May, according to Customs and Border Protection. Since then, Ukrainians have been subject to the same land border restrictions that have been placed on tens of thousands of Mexicans and Central Americans who have largely been barred from seeking asylum due to a controversial executive order that has been in place and selectively enforced since the start of the coronavirus pandemic.

According to The Washington Post, at the current rate of accepting refugees from Ukraine, the Biden administration could reach its goal of accepting 100,000 Ukrainians this summer, announced in April. Officials stressed that this number is a commitment, not a ceiling; this means that the reception can – and should – continue after the promised mark is reached.

Given that the conflict in Ukraine could become protracted, the US administration would be wise to prepare for a long-term commitment, emphasizes The Washington Post. Most Ukrainians who left their homes hoping to return soon have been waiting in neighboring countries – Poland, Romania, Moldova and other countries of Eastern Europe. As the conflict drags on, more Ukrainians are likely to take advantage of resettlement opportunities further west to Western Europe and Canada, as well as the United States.

The Biden administration's sponsorship program is groundbreaking, freeing the government from its traditional role of resettling and supporting refugees. For now, this is a workable solution, but it only allows you to stay in the US for two years. This should not prevent Ukrainians who do not have U.S. sponsors from applying to enter the country through the regular refugee channel, a long-term process that allows them to settle permanently in the United States, writes The Washington Post.

Department of the Interior data shows that most of those Ukrainians who have entered the U.S. so far arrived on visas or crossed the U.S.-Mexico border, rather than through the Biden administration's Uniting for Ukraine web portal, which allows Americans to sponsor Ukrainians they know.

President and CEO of the Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Service, Krish O'Mara Vinyaraja, says the Biden administration is inflating the number of Ukrainians it has worked on because only 15,000 have gone through the system it created: who actually did not go through the “Unity for Ukraine” program. I think the numbers show the current specific nature of the program. Ukrainian refugees are creatively exploring every avenue to find asylum in the US. But we have to make it as simple and clear as possible.”

As NBC News reports, only 300 Ukrainians have been resettled under the traditional US refugee program, which uses federal funds to take United Nations-verified refugees and resettle them in communities with resources to help find doctors, schools, jobs and connections. with their culture.

While Biden vowed to revisit the program after the Trump administration cut it drastically, his administration used emergency humanitarian powers to quickly but temporarily bring in the Afghans and Ukrainians. Many Afghans who served with US troops are left stranded in Afghanistan, which is now under the control of the Taliban (the organization is recognized as a terrorist organization and banned in the Russian Federation), while others brought to the US find themselves forced to wait in long lines to apply for benefits such as work permits.

Lacey Bromel, a political analyst for the International Refugee Project, says the large number of Ukrainians admitted to the US shows what the Biden administration could accept more refugees from other countries if they wanted to do it: “It's a reflection that when they have the political will, they can do it. We want the same to apply to Afghans who are still awaiting parole and to other populations awaiting admission under the US Refugee Program.”

Источник www.mk.ru

Biden announced the transfer of the United States “150 years ago” because of the decision on abortion

Biden: Supreme Court decision to repeal abortion right set US back 150 years Supreme Court decision to overturn 1973 abortion right ruling is a 'tragic mistake' that literally set the US back 150 years, Joe Biden says

Joe Biden

The U.S. Supreme Court's decision to overturn a 49-year-old ruling that federally guaranteed the right to abortion is a “tragic mistake”; and “pursuing an extremist ideology,” said US President Joe Biden.

In his opinion, the court did not restrict, but took away a right that matters to a large number of Americans. “The Supreme Court has unequivocally taken away from the American people a constitutional right they already recognized. They just took him. This has never been done with a right that is so important to so many Americans, — he noted.

Biden pointed out that this decision endangers the health and lives of women.

“The Court literally took America back 150 years. In my opinion, this is a sad day for the country, but this does not mean that the fight is over,— he emphasized. Biden urged voters in November to vote for members of Congress who would be willing to include abortion protection in legislation.

The President of the United States also recalled that if a woman lives in a state that restricts abortion, then the decision of the Supreme Court does not prohibit her from traveling to a state where abortion is allowed.

Leaders of other countries also reacted to the decision of the US Supreme Court. Thus, French President Emmanuel Macron expressed solidarity with American women, whose freedoms are “infringed”.

Read on RBC Pro Pro How to Save Taxes with Intellectual Property Instructions Pro Home prices are falling around the world. Will the 2008 crisis repeat Articles Pro Why IT specialists won't come to work for you: seven mistakes of companies They don't know you here: how companies can build a reputation in a new country“Abortion is the fundamental right of all women. It must be protected. I want to express my solidarity with women whose freedoms are being violated by the Supreme Court of the United States, — he wrote on Twitter.

British Prime Minister Boris Johnson expressed regret over the decision of the US Supreme Court. He considered it “a big step back” and emphasized that he had always believed in the right of women to choose.

Earlier on June 24, the U.S. Supreme Court overturned a 49-year-old Roe v. Wade ruling that federally guaranteed the right to abortion.

Five of six Republican judges voted to overturn, while how Chief Justice John Roberts and three Democratic Justices opposed.

Roe v. Wade listened to in the 1970s in Texas. Norma McCorvey, under the pseudonym Jane Roe, filed a lawsuit in the district court, because Texas laws did not allow her to have an abortion. The defendant was District Attorney Henry Wade. The case went to the Supreme Court, which ruled in favor of Roe, acknowledging that a woman can terminate a pregnancy of her own free will until the fetus becomes viable.

Thus the court legalized abortion at the federal level, the states lost their ability to forbid. Missouri became the first state to return the ban on abortion after the decision of the Supreme Court.

Authors Tags

Источник rbc.ru

Russia’s “calibers” will soon run out “: Leonkov responded to a rumor

An expert compared the effectiveness of our high-precision missiles and American Tomahawks

Most of the tasks of Ukraine's demilitarization are carried out by high-precision Kalibr missiles. Many people remember how they checked out terrorist bases in Syria. Now they are applied to Ukrainian military facilities. The network compares the characteristics of the “Caliber” with the American Tomahawk cruise missiles. At the same time, some point out that thousands of Tomahawks were fired at Iraq and Yugoslavia, and Russian Calibers over Ukraine – not so often. From which the conclusion is drawn: Russia has few Calibers, they will run out soon, there will be nothing to work on important targets.

To comment on these assumptions and compare the use of “Caliber” and the American Tomahawk (“Tomahawk”, battle ax of the American Indians) “MK” asked a military analyst, editor of the magazine “Arsenal of the Fatherland” Alexei Leonkov.

Photo: vitalykuzmin.net.

– Tactical and technical characteristics can be measured as much as you like, – says the expert. – Both of them will have a plus in some ways, a minus in some. But the main thing here is the efficiency of application and versatility.

American Tomahawks are mainly used against ground targets. And our “Caliber” is a whole family of missiles. They were immediately created as a platform and can work both on ground targets, and on sea and even underwater targets – there are also such “Calibers”. That is, we created them as a universal weapon that the fleet needed to solve a variety of tasks: both destroying naval targets and providing fire support to ground groups.

We have created a missile that can be placed on ships, submarines and land carriers. For example, we have the Iskander-M missile system. On it is a rocket, very similar to the “Caliber” – 9M729. Why did the Americans get so excited about it, believing that we simply put a Caliber missile into the Iskander, and it will fly as far as it flies from ships and submarines.

– Let them get excited. After all, when the United States withdrew from the INF treaty, our president said that in response, it would not be difficult for us to “land” our sea-based missiles. So, what were they fighting for… And are Tomahawks put only on surface ships?

– Basically. True, they made the Virginia Block V submarine, on which they also put a certain version of the Tomahawk. At the beginning, the boat's ammunition included about 12 missiles. Then it was increased to 40. But they still have such a boat in piece copies (by 2029, 9 such submarines should enter service. – “MK”).

And we have “Caliber” on the submarines of the near sea zone of the project 636 “Varshavyanka” and the far sea zone – the submarines of the project 677 “Severodvinsk” and “Kazan”.

– We have a whole family of ships, starting from small missile ones, that carry Caliber. And all of them must be provided with ammunition. And the standard ammunition of the ship consists not only of those missiles that are directly on it. If, for example, we are talking about a strike group, then there is also a set of such missiles on support ships. And he must be there all the time. To do this, defense plants operate in a constant mode. And now in general in three shifts. “Calibers” are being made and will be made. Their production does not stop. So in Kyiv, let them not “worry” about us, let them think about themselves better.

– Of course, “Caliber” how much they don't beat in vain. It is inefficient, neither economically nor militarily, to hit sparrows with a cannon. However, one can often hear a misjudgment when they say: let's compare how much a rocket costs and the “barn” in which it hit. Say, it is inefficient! In fact, efficiency is measured differently. It is important what was actually in that “barn”. And when it turns out, then they say (conditionally, of course): yes, they also needed to throw a nuclear bomb there …

Of course, it is always required to adequately assess the targets for destruction. For example, the Kremenchug Oil Refinery, through which Caliber arrived. Could it be destroyed with other weapons? Yes, you can. Suppose we send aviation. But if the Ukrainian air defense was not completely suppressed, our aviation would immediately receive anti-aircraft missiles, as they say, on the tail. It is not clear whether some of the planes would have returned from there or not. That is, when means of destruction are selected, first of all they are evaluated in terms of the guaranteed result of the combat mission and the possibility of losses.

– If, for example, to hit distant targets – a thousand kilometers away, then the “Caliber”, of course, is good. The Ukrainians tried to shoot him down – and somewhere, they say, they shot him down. But still, the Caliber carried out their tasks in any case.

The Americans calculated how much we had already used up our high-precision missiles since the beginning of the special operation in Ukraine. Calibers, Iskanders, Kinzhals and other air-launched missiles were counted – all precision-guided munitions combined. Their number has exceeded 2000 units.

– Can. For example, I calculated that starting from 1991 – that is, from the first use of Tomahawks in Iraq to 2018, including the last salvo in Syria, which they fired back under Trump, on April 14, 2018 – during all this time, the Americans used 2520 Tomahawk missiles.

– Yes, but I emphasize: they counted not only the Caliber, but all of our high-precision missiles. This is Anglo-Saxon data.

“We are more productive. The Americans had more punctures. In Iraq in 1991, 65% of Tomahawk missiles reached their targets. If you recall Yugoslavia, then in 1999 they used 412 Tomahawks there. Of these, a little more than half reached the goal. The efficiency was 55%, because the Yugoslav air defense was working there. In Syria, in 2017, the effectiveness of the Tomahawk was 39%, and in 2018 – 20%.

– The effectiveness of Tomahawks depends on the effectiveness of the anti-aircraft system that counteracts them.

– Yes . In Ukraine, at the very beginning of the special military operation, there really was a good air defense system, until we destroyed it. And then there were isolated cases of the destruction of our “Caliber”. The Ukrainian Buk-M1, Tor-M1 and Osa complexes worked on them. But I repeat: all these cases were isolated.

– Rather higher. We can talk about 90-95 percent efficiency. And let no one hope that we will not have enough missiles. Both now and in the future, we will always have enough of these missiles.

Comparative characteristics of Caliber/Tomahawk missiles: warhead weight – 450kg/340 kg; maximum flight range – 2600km/1600km; cruising speed – 1000 km/h/885 km/h; impact speed – 3600 km/h/1200 km/h; probable deviation from the target – 2-4 meters/5-10 meters.

Источник www.mk.ru

In the United States, after the start of a special operation in Ukraine, the traffic of RT and Sputnik websites increased

Microsoft has conducted a study, according to which in the United States, after the start of the Russian special operation in Ukraine, there is an increase in traffic to RT and Sputnik websites.

The company has prepared a 40-page report on the alleged Russian disinformation, as well as cyber attacks, reports RT. The study indicates that traffic has increased significantly since January of this year. It peaked on February 24 (an increase of 82%).

The report says that despite measures aimed at reducing traffic to the RT and Sputnik websites, the figures are higher than before the special operation. In quantitative terms, they are comparable to the attendance of The Wall Street Journal.

Earlier, Russia Today Editor-in-Chief Margarita Simonyan commented on the amendments to the Austrian media law. For quoting RT and Sputnik, under the new law, you can get a fine of 50 thousand euros.

Rate the material

Источник aif.ru

Thailand extradited a Russian to the United States after the decision to extradite him to Russia

Dmitry Ukrainsky in the United States is accused of embezzling $ 30 million. The Thai authorities, where he was detained in 2016, approved the extradition of the Russian to both Russia and the United States. His wife informed human rights activists about the extradition of the Ukrainian to the USA

The Thai authorities have extradited Russian citizen Dmitry Ukrainsky to the United States, who is accused of embezzling funds from American citizens with subsequent legalization in Thailand, TASS reports citing Ivan Melnikov, deputy chairman of the Russian branch of the International Committee for the Defense of Human Rights.

The human rights activist told the agency that Ukrainskiy's wife turned to him with a letter about the violation of her husband's rights. “Her husband was extradited from Thailand on June 16, 2022, despite two conflicting rulings from the Kingdom of Thailand to extradite him to the United States and simultaneously to Russia and an additional trial, in an atmosphere of extreme secrecy, which was more like a kidnapping.” ,— explained Melnikov.

He stressed that, according to the protocol to the consular convention between Russia and the United States of 1964, when a Russian was detained or arrested, the consular person should have been notified of this within three days, but this did not happen. Therefore, Melnikov asked US Attorney General Merrick Garland to provide Russian diplomats with information about the places of detention of Ukrainian in custody and the charges against him and arrange a meeting with the consul for him.

RBC sent inquiries to the press services of the Thai police and the Russian embassy in Thailand and turned to Ivan Melnikov for comment.

Ukrainian was arrested in Pattaya in 2016 at the request of the FBI. The authorities of the kingdom sentenced him to 10 years in prison. In the summer of the same year, the Russian side turned to the Prosecutor General's Office of Thailand with a request to extradite Ukrainian. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs sent a note to the kingdom about the inadmissibility of the extradition of a Russian to the United States.

In 2017, the court approved his extradition to Russia, and in 2019, the Thai authorities allowed the extradition of the Russian to the United States. The court concluded that the hacker group to which the accused belonged stole more than $30 million from the cards of citizens of the United States, Australia, Japan, Italy, Great Britain and Germany. US authorities have been investigating the Russian since 2014, when they discovered several suspicious transfers of funds to Thai accounts. Ukrainian denies his guilt.

Read on RBC Pro Pro He loves cola and hates sports: how the anti-life Elon Musk lives Articles Pro The head of the Skolkovo school: “These six mistakes harm corporate culture” . How e-commerce adjusts to this Pro instructions From magazine to airline: Reading “Losing my virginity” by Richard Branson Summary Pro Capitalism in Russia failed to build. What model to replace it Articles Pro What companies need to consider when creating a corporate superapp for employees Instructions Pro National features of business management in Russia Lecture

In 2019, a Russian went on a hunger strike for more than a month to get a review of the case.

In In Russia, he is also accused of fraud: according to the investigation, from April to May 2013, Ukrainian as part of a group stole more than 7.5 million rubles. «by deceit and breach of trust».

Authors Tags Subscribe to Telegram

Источник rbc.ru

Assessed the prospects of the Republican bid for the secession of Texas from the United States

Local separatism called 'polarization on steroids'

Texas Republicans at their convention this weekend called for a referendum to determine whether the state should “reclaim its status as an independent nation.” This is not the first time that some Texans are in favor of secession from the Lone Star State and the formation of an independent state. Let's try to figure out how great the Texas separatists' chances of success are this time.

Photo: AP

Texas Republicans want to secede from the US. Can they do it? “The federal government has violated our right to local self-government. Therefore, federal legislation that violates the rights of Texas under the 10th Amendment should be ignored, opposed, rejected and repealed, ”says the political platform approved by delegates to the Texas Republican party convention.

According to the Independent, calls for secession are nothing new in Texas. After all, this is a state that prides itself on its independence. But do separatists stand a chance in an age of heightened polarization?

Darrell M. West, director of governance research at the Brookings Institution, thinks that's unlikely to happen any time soon.

“There are people in Texas who don't like the direction the United States is headed on a wide range of issues, including immigration, gun control, climate change. But it's one thing to complain about the national government, and another to chart your own course,” he comments to the Independent. “Once they get into it, they will discover how difficult it is. Will Texas need to develop its own currency? Will he have his own army? Will people need a passport to travel from Texas to Oklahoma? And, of course, there is the question of whether the nation will really allow Texas to secede.”

The answer to the last of these questions was already given by the US Supreme Court more than 150 years ago, after several difficult decades that marked the state's youth. As the Independent recalls, Texas was part of Mexico until it gained independence in 1836. It was an independent nation for nine years before joining the United States. Then, in 1861, Texas seceded from the US in solidarity with the “fraternal slave states” and formed the Confederacy, which started the American Civil War.

Even before the end of the Civil War, the Supreme Court declared secession illegal. In Texas v. White of 1869, the court ruled that states could not secede unilaterally and nullified Texans' efforts to secede from the American federation. The state was reunited with the United States in 1870 at the end of the Civil War.

However, some Texans in the Republican-dominated state are holding out hope of choosing their own path again. According to Darrell West, these calls become louder when the White House is occupied by a Democrat. But today the national political atmosphere also plays a role.

“This is the logical culmination of political polarization. There has just been a sharp increase in our internal divisions, and people do not trust each other. Secession is essentially polarization on steroids,” says the expert.

“It just tells us what a perilous time we live in. Crazy ideas that used to be on the fringes are now on party platforms,” adds West.

Dreams of secession are not exclusive to Republicans. When Donald Trump was elected in 2016, the securely Democratic state of California also toyed with the idea of ​​secession—the so-called “Kaliaxite.”

Richard Kreitner, author of Break It Down: Secession, Division, and the Secret History of America's Imperfect Union ”, says that although the secession of any state seems a distant prospect today, this does not mean that it will never happen.

“It is quite expected that a party that has been deprived of power in its largest state will think about secession, as liberals did in the largest Democratic state (California) under Trump,” he says. “However, with each presidency, the flirtation with secession, so to speak, has come closer and closer to completion.”

Kreitner argues that the frequent calls for secession from both sides should cause some soul-searching in Americans.


In any case, according to Darrell West, it may soon be time for Democrats to think about leaving again. The next few years will likely mark a shift in power from Democrats to Republicans due to institutional imbalances in the Electoral College and the historic precedent of the midterm elections.

“It would actually be shortsighted for Texas to try to leave now, because By all indications, Republicans are poised to do well in 2022 and possibly even 2024. be at the head of the country. Other people may grow dissatisfied with conservative dominance,” West says.

For Kreitner, the “signal” from the Texas Republicans heralds more serious problems with the American political system: “It confirms what we all already know namely, that we have a completely non-functional political system, completely out of step with the challenges that our society faces, and that unless there is some kind of constitutional breakthrough that leads to a more intelligent top-to-bottom recycling, someone will eventually will decide that it is better for them to leave and go about their business.

Источник www.mk.ru

Musk said the inevitability of a recession in the United States

Photo: Global Look Press

It is highly likely that a slowdown in economic growth or a decline in production in the United States of America will occur in the near future.

This assumption was made by American businessman, inventor and billionaire Elon Musk during a video conference speech at the Qatar Economic Forum.

“It will happen rather than not,” the businessman said.

On June 20, US President Joe Biden told the press that a recession in the country is unlikely. His colleagues in the Ministries of Energy and Finance are in solidarity with the President. Independent analysts are increasingly leaning towards Musk's point of view, relying on numbers: in May, inflation in the United States of America reached 8.6% for the first time in forty years.

Источник www.mk.ru

Mercenaries from the United States spoke about the “chaos” in the battle near Kharkov

“More than a hundred infantrymen advanced on our positions”

A former American soldier who fought on the side of the Armed Forces of Ukraine spoke in an interview with CNN about the battle, which he witnessed on June 9 near Kharkov, when two US mercenaries Andy Huyn and Alexander Druke were captured. The channel's interlocutor also spoke about the numerical superiority of the Russian military.

Photo: Global Look Press

A man named Pip reported that his unit was sent on a mission east of Kharkov, where a full-scale Russian armored offensive was underway. The group was forced to retreat quickly as more than 100 Russian infantry went on the attack. When asked about what happened to Huyn and Druke, Peep replied that he did not have this information.

Another mercenary who participated in the battle, acting as a sergeant, told that there was “absolute chaos” that day. “Our positions were attacked by more than a hundred infantrymen. We had a T-72 that opened fire from a distance of 30-40 meters,” the man shared the details.

Meanwhile, the United States is unable to confirm the location of the third mercenary to go to Ukraine, U.S. Marine veteran Grady Kurpasi, who retired last November. “We don’t know where they are, but I want to reiterate: Americans should not go to Ukraine now,” US President Joe Biden said.

On June 15, it was reported that Russian army soldiers were taken prisoner near Kharkov two American mercenaries who took part in the armed conflict on the side of Ukraine. According to data published by The Telegraph, 39-year-old Druke and 27-year-old Huyn are considered the first Americans captured.

Huyn, in particular, said that he was part of a detachment that belonged to the reconnaissance battalion. After receiving the order to retreat, he and his colleague walked through the forest belt for a long time, and then decided to surrender to the Russian military.

US mercenaries were captured in Ukraine: the life of Alexander Dryuke and Andy Hune

See related photo gallery

Источник www.mk.ru

Political scientist told why the United States provoked the EU to impose anti-Russian sanctions

“This is a classic scam”

Despite the fact that the United States and the European Union jointly oppose Russia against the backdrop of what is happening in Ukraine, experts believe that the Americans are pursuing their own goals in the current situation. Thus, political scientist and economist Mikhail Khazin said that the US provoked the EU to impose sanctions against the Russian Federation in order to take a significant part of its capital in the future.

Photo: Global Look Press

In an interview with the Federal Business Journal, Khazin noted that the events that are now unfolding in the geopolitical arena are “a provocation brilliantly organized by the United States.” According to the expert, its meaning is to force the EU to impose sanctions against the Russian Federation that are absolutely not beneficial to it, and Washington's tactics have already brought results.

The political scientist explained that by opposing the Kremlin, the European Union plunged itself into a severe crisis. At the same time, according to Khazin, the US itself suffers from a confrontation with the Russian Federation, but the EU in this situation is much worse off. According to the specialist's forecast, soon the Americans will “drag to themselves” most of the capital from the European Union, and in the future, they may even lift sanctions against Russia altogether.

According to Khazin, the US actions are a “classic trick”. The political scientist explained that in this situation, the “rich fool” begins to be frightened by someone and told how he will have to fight back, they express support for him, and then it turns out that because of this “mythical struggle” he was left without money.

The expert believes that approximately 70% of the EU capital will go to the United States, another 20% to Russia, and 10% will go to the UK. Khazin concluded that in the context of the “degradation of the liberal model of the West”, the sanctions confrontation with the Russian Federation was necessary for the States only to maintain their economy at the expense of their own “European partners”.

Read also:Ruslan Khasbulatov called the reason why Ukraine decided to turn its back on Russia

Источник www.mk.ru

Medvedev urged to pacify the United States in Khrushchev’s way: “they will crawl themselves”

The ex-president remembered the shoe and the rostrum at the UN

Deputy Chairman of the Russian Security Council Dmitry Medvedev spoke about the prospects for extending the START-3 Treaty with the United States (on measures to further reduce and limit strategic offensive weapons). He noted that now he does not see much point in this.

Photo: Gennady Cherkasov

Medvedev wrote in his Telegram -channel that the issue of extending START-3 will depend on the position of the current head of state Vladimir Putin.

“In turn, as a person who was directly related to START-3 and signed it in 2010, I consider the time the most unsuitable for new negotiations,” — said the ex-president.

According to Medvedev, back in 2021 the situation was different, as Putin spoke about. Then, by exchanging notes with US President Joe Biden, the agreement was extended for five years.

Now, the member of the Security Council of the Russian Federation noted, relations with the United States are virtually absent and are “at zero Kelvin.” Medvedev also sees no point in unfreezing these relations, since, according to him, this is harmful for Russia.

“Let them come running or crawling themselves and ask about it. And they appreciate it as a special favor,” — emphasized the politician.

In conclusion Medvedev added that there is another effective way to communicate with Washington. The ex-president in this case turned to the experience of the Soviet General Secretary Nikita Khrushchev.

“By the way, there is another proven method of communicating with America on this topic – shoe on the UN podium. It used to…», — he summarized.

Источник www.mk.ru

CNN learned that the United States is concerned about possible Russian interference in the elections

We are talking about the November elections to the US Congress. At the same time, officials acknowledge that the likelihood of interference is “hypothetical”. Russia has previously denied all accusations of interference in the affairs of the country

In the United States called the Russian “Caliber” deadly and accurate weapons

The American security expert Alex Batley, in an article for 19Fortyfive, called the Caliber high-precision missiles deadly and accurate weapons.

According to him, the cruise missiles in service with the RF Armed Forces are capable of destroying distant targets, and the 450-kilogram warhead of the Russian missile “can be equipped with both conventional and nuclear fillings.”

Batley also stressed that nuclear and non-nuclear submarines, frigates and larger warships are equipped with such missiles.

ships can put distant targets at risk, which makes it easier for the Russian military to deter, threaten and destroy targets, — added an American expert.

He noted that advanced military development Russia is a threat to the West . Batley stressed that the forces of the Russian Navy are located all over the world, which is why the threat to Western countries will exist for many years. the arsenal of artillery weapons and ammunition of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in the area of ​​​​the settlement of Priluki, Chernihiv region.

Rate the material

Источник aif.ru

Slavery in the United States: leave can not be banned. Where is the comma placed?

160 years ago, June 19, 1862, US President Abraham Lincolnsigned a document that is considered to be sometimes “great”, sometimes “historically important”, and sometimes “fateful”. A law developed and approved by the US Congress was sent to for to signature. This law prohibited “slavery now and henceforth in” all present and future territories of the United States.

Is the patient not dead?

This impressive rhetoric can indeed lead to the thought that the document is fateful. It may even seem that everything else was already a matter of technology, and the final lid came to slavery. It says    on all present and future territories”, and also “From now on henceforth”!

However, the real situation with slavery in the United States is best described by a quote from the cult Soviet film “Office Romance”: "Bublikov died… And then he did not die. Will will die again — unknown…" Yes Yes exactly. Slavery was abolished and banned more than once, and for a long time it was somehow not abolished and not prohibited. Moreover, some subtleties allow us to believe that this most disgraceful public institution, like Bublikov, still did not die. Well, at least can easily rise from the ashes and come back legally.

In general, the same gap between the loudly proclaimed intention and the reality “in” all the current and “future territories of the United States” sometimes so great that there is a temptation to declare these proclamations cold-blooded lies and hypocrisy. A classic example — Vermont, which, in fact, set the direction for & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; eradication of slavery. It was started for health. In 1777, Vermont, then quite an independent republic, adopted a Constitution that stated: “All men are born equally free and independent, and have natural and inalienable rights by which they may defend their lives and liberty. .. No man born in this country or coming from across the sea can be a slave or ward of another person after he reaches the age of 21 years. The same applies to women who have reached the age of 18.

It sounds perfect. That's just in  1790 year, a year before the entry of Vermont into the United States on state rights and 13 years after the adoption of the Constitution, in the free republic» there were 16 & nbsp; officially registered slaves. How many of them really bent their backs on the owners — God knows.

Slaves on a plantation in South Carolina, 1862 Source: Public Domain

Who crawled into the loophole?

However, there are questions about the formula of the Constitution. Suppose adult slavery was abolished. And what about kids, teens and young adults? Completely incomprehensible. Either they were simply forgotten, or they deliberately left a loophole. The latter seems much more likely.

Although for the reason that such a line guaranteed rapid, almost explosive growth of the economy in general and so rapid enrichment of individuals in particular. Is it necessary to separately mention that among these “individuals” many have occupied a prominent place, including the most famous “Founding Fathers” of the USA?

Benjamin Franklin looks more respectable than the others. He owned slaves for a long time, but by 1781 he had abandoned the business, and in 1790 he filed a petition in Congress to abolish slavery “without distinction in color of skin.” However, his colleagues — Thomas Jefferson and George Washington —practiced something fundamentally different.

The same Washington, as you know, was born in the family of a small landowner. Then — a successful marriage and a dowry of 300 slaves. As a result, by the time of his election to the presidency, Washington was one of the richest people in the country. And and still is one of the richest presidents in the entire history of the United States.

Thomas Jefferson was at least not far behind. During his lifetime, he owned 600 slaves, including children:  Locked in a stuffy, smoky workshop, the boys minted 5-10 thousand nails a day, which in 1796 brought Jefferson 2 thousand dollars of total income. Back then, his nail factory competed with the state penitentiary.

“425” width=”640″ style=”display: block;” />

“Husbands, wives and families, sold indiscriminately to different buyers, forcibly separated — they will probably never meet again, 1843, New York Public Library. Source: Public Domain

It is clear that in such a scenario, all attempts to initially introduce some kind of article into the US Constitution, if not abolishing, then at least restricting slavery, were doomed. The USA has become a unique, the only state in the world that was created as a capitalist, democratic and slaveholding at the same time — The Constitution of 1787 recognized slavery as a completely legal phenomenon.

So the Congress could pass, and  the incumbent president could sign any laws, even if they were notable for off-scale pathos and abolitionist rhetoric. These loud acts were worthless on a market day, since there was a Constitution that dominated all other laws. Lincoln, by the way, was well aware of this. And that everything he understood about slavery before the end of the Civil War of 1861-1865 can be judged by his own formula: My most important task in this struggle — save the Union, not save or destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing the slaves, I would do it, and if it had to save all the slaves to save it, I would do it too».

Actually, he and did something very similar. The famous Emancipation Proclamation September 22, 1862 — the presidential decree, which was issued, ironically, after the law on the abolition of slavery “on” all current and future territories of the United States, is about this. According to the “Proclamation” slaves in those states that did not voluntarily return to the United States before January 1, 1863, were declared free. The formulation is perfect. Any state of the South could join the forces of the North and automatically keep slavery within its territorial boundaries. The fact that nobody used it does cancel the main rule — legitimate loopholes for the revival of slavery must always be left.

Slaves of the 21st century

The Thirteenth Amendment to the US Constitution left those. Congress passed it in January, 1865, and three-quarters of the states ratified it in December of that same year, that is, after the end of the Civil War. It is believed that she completely and finally, at the level of the Basic Law of the country, eliminated slavery.

So it is. But there were still a few states that did not ratify the amendment. And formally, slavery persisted in some places for another hundred years, and then and more. For example, in Kentucky, the Thirteenth Amendment was ratified in 1976. In Mississippi seemed to be done by 1995 the year but they got confused during the registration, and slavery was finally abolished only in 2013 the year.

And the most interesting thing is that when you carefully read the Thirteenth Amendment, which is still in effect, and which US statesmen are very proud of, you will definitely stumble over one caveat: “Neither  nor  servitude, unless they are a punishment for a crime for which the person has been duly convicted, must not exist in the United States or any other place subject to their jurisdiction. Clear? So slavery, of course, is prohibited. But only if it is not  is a properly executed punishment for some crime. That is, you cannot trade in people. And to appoint a person as a slave — can. Even if it's in theory. And the state can do it. The the thing that is considered to be the standard of freedom and democracy.

Rate the material

Источник aif.ru

Reuters learned about the “dead end” in the supply of Gray Eagle drones to Ukraine from the United States

The Pentagon fears that the expensive Gray Eagle drones could get to the opposing forces of the Armed Forces, the sale of drones to Kyiv has been suspended, sources told Reuters. The deal provided for Ukraine to receive four UAVs

Drone Gray Eagle

The process of selling U.S. MQ-1 °C Gray Eagle drones to Ukraine has been suspended due to Pentagon fears that the drones could fall into the hands of opposing forces, Reuters reports citing two informed sources.

Objection to the deal put forward by the Department of Defense Technology Security of the US military, the agency writes, this division is engaged in ensuring the security of expensive technologies so that they do not end up with an undesirable party.

The Ukrainian authorities have repeatedly turned to the United States and other Western countries with a request for more modern weapons. The request to sell the Gray Eagle was made, in particular, at the end of April. Washington has already sent Switchblade and Phoenix Ghost kamikaze drones to Kyiv, but Ukrainian authorities are interested in Gray Eagle and Reaper due to the ability of these drone models to travel a considerable distance at high altitude and reload.

As Politico wrote, the Ukrainian authorities have already been negotiating the purchase of Gray Eagle with their manufacturer— General Atomics, however, such a deal falls under the Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR), which restricts their supply. Some US partners, including Qatar and Indonesia, were previously unable to obtain the Gray Eagle and Reaper, the newspaper noted. As of early June, the Pentagon had been discussing the transfer of Gray Eagle drones to Ukraine for several weeks, unnamed sources told Reuters.

In early June, Politico sources at the Pentagon and experts interviewed expressed doubt that Ukrainian forces would start using the Gray Eagle in combat anytime soon due to logistical and military training issues. To use drones of this type, it is necessary to undergo training for several months, depending on the configuration, the interlocutors of the newspaper indicated. At the same time, the manufacturing company General Atomics admitted that the training process for the Ukrainian military could be reduced due to “urgent needs”; Kyiv.

Read on RBC Pro Pro Banks in Russia are urgently changing their software due to sanctions. What awaits the financial market Forecasts Pro Features of the business environment in Turkey: what kind of business do Russians open there how bans affect different sectors of the economy Studies Pro Pay a lot, get fired quickly: what it's like to work at Netflix – in 5 points Pro articles 12 most popular Russian stocks: what experts expect from them Pro articles p>In addition, Gray Eagle drones require extensive ground infrastructure, including runways, special equipment and encrypted communication channels, Vertical Flight Society expert Dan Gattinger told Politico.

Authors Tags Subscribe to Telegram RBC Stay up to date with the latest news even in conditions of blocking

Источник rbc.ru

Patrushev said that students are returning from the United States as “agitators” of revolutions

The United States specifically encourages short-term educational trips in order to use them to turn students into agitators and carry out democratic changes, Patrushev said, calling for more attention to be paid to the information sphere

Nikolai Patrushev

Students who go to the United States to study return to their homeland as agitators ready to set the stage for “color revolutions”, Secretary of the Russian Security Council Nikolai Patrushev said at a meeting of the Committee of Secretaries of Security Councils of the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) in Yerevan, reports ” ;RIA Novosti".

“In Washington <…> are aimed at changing school and university education, supporting short-term trips of the best students to America, from where they return as agitators, ready to carry out the so-called democratic transformations and create the ground for the realization of “color revolution” scenarios, & mdash; said the Secretary of the Security Council.

Earlier, Deputy Head of the Ministry of Education and Science Dmitry Afanasiev said that Russian universities withdrew from the Bologna education system by decision of the Bologna Group on April 11. The fact that the department intends to abandon the Bologna system and develop its own, Russian system of higher education, which will be based on the interests of the national economy, was said at the end of May by its head Valery Falkov.

Rector of the Ural State Law University. VF Yakovleva, President of the Association for Legal Education Vladimir Bublik positively assessed this decision. He compared the Bologna system of education to a “cesspool”; and stated that abandoning it would give young people the opportunity to grow up as “normal people, normal citizens.”

Read on RBC Pro Pro How to find financial reserves for a rainy day. Taking inventory Instructions Pro What seven types of transactions can end in a criminal case Cases Pro I work a lot and spend little time with my child. Am I a bad parent? Pro How a Programmer Became the Youngest AI Billionaire Pro Articles Jack Dorsey-Style Biohacking: Why a Billionaire Eats Once a Day Pro Articles Should I Adopt Weird Silicon Valley Healthy Habits Pro Articles What's Wrong Articles Pro James Bond and 4 More Types of Candidates HR Dislikes Instructions

After studying in the West, “there are guys coming back who have literally been exposed to that ideology,” Bublik said. “Both sexually and in terms of liberal values, these are different people. As a father, I would not want my daughter (she plans to study art, so she will go to European universities, where art and architecture are) returned as a different person, professing other values, — he noted. According to Bublik, Russia will fight to “not give away” children “there”, despite the appeal of Western countries.

The rector called for educating the youth “within the framework of Russian Orthodoxy, within the framework of Islam, within the framework of our natural values”, thereby ensuring its “normal development”.

Authors Tags Subscribe to RuTube RBC Live broadcasts, videos and recordings of programs on our RuTube channel

Источник rbc.ru

Peskov called the condition for the resumption of relations between Russia and the United States

According to the presidential press secretary, the only way to normalize relations with the United States would be for Washington to abandon the policy of hegemonism

Dmitry Peskov

become a vassal. About this in an interview with RIA Novosti said the press secretary of the President of Russia Dmitry Peskov.

“The only way” it is to abandon the policy of hegemonism in world affairs and understand that Russia does not want, cannot and is not going to be anyone's vassal, in any sense of the word, — said the Kremlin spokesman.

According to Peskov, only when there is a “maturing” that it is possible to speak with Russia on the basis of mutual benefit and mutual respect, then it will be time to plan the next contacts.

Earlier, Peskov said that relations between Russia and the United States are at a zero point, and there is no dialogue between the countries. Assessing the results of last year's summit in Geneva, the spokesman said that they are worthless.

Russia's relations with Western countries deteriorated sharply after the start of a special operation in Ukraine on February 24. President Vladimir Putin, announcing it, said that Moscow took such a step to protect the population of Donbass from “genocide”, to achieve “denazification and demilitarization” Ukraine.

Read on RBC Pro Pro Success according to Freud: how a hot dog stand became a McDonald's fast food empire focus Articles Pro The self-employed are more and more in demand: who and how hires them in Russia Articles Pro Four useful practices to help cope with stress Instructions Pro The tax authorities believe that the cost of a manager is too high. How to be Instructions Pro The geography of employees is ever wider: how the community can help and how to create it Instructions Pro Let's break through: three keys to success in strategic planning Articles

After the start of the special operation, Ukraine severed diplomatic relations with Russia, introduced martial law and announced general mobilization. Western countries, in particular the United States, have imposed sanctions against certain Russian politicians and officials, as well as members of their families. The restrictions affected banks, industry, transport and other sectors of the economy. In addition, the United States and its allies began to massively expel employees of Russian diplomatic missions.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said earlier that Moscow would “seriously think” before resuming relations with Western countries, even if they offered it do.

At the same time, US Ambassador to Russia John Sullivan noted that Washington and Moscow cannot completely break off diplomatic relations, as they must maintain bilateral contacts. “We will also never part at all. We cannot take and break off diplomatic relations and stop talking to each other,— he said.

Authors Tags Subscribe to VK RBC Get news faster than anyone else

Источник rbc.ru

The Foreign Ministry hoped that the United States would not use nuclear weapons because of Ukraine

Washington has a limited nuclear war approach, while Moscow does not accept the use of this type of weapons, Ryabkov said. The US accuses Russia of “rhetorical play” on this issue, but this is fake, he claims

The use of nuclear weapons by the United States because of the crisis in Ukraine will become an irreversible event, Russia rejects the concept of a limited nuclear strike, said Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov on the Rossiya 1 television channel.

“I hope that, after all, the remnants of common sense will allow these politicians, these applicants for the role of world conductors, to refrain from making such decisions,” — emphasized the diplomat.

Ryabkov expressed confidence that the United States and “their military planners” the ideology of limited nuclear war is characteristic. Western countries, according to the Deputy Foreign Minister, “are trying to accuse us of allegedly playing some kind of rhetorical game.” on the use of nuclear weapons.

“This is completely untrue. These are useless arguments, but we are accustomed to the fact that the West has nothing left but distortion and fakes,— he claims (quote from Kommersant).

Earlier, Deputy Chairman of the Security Council Dmitry Medvedev warned that the shipment of weapons to Ukraine and NATO exercises near the Russian borders increase the risk of a direct clash between Russia and the alliance, and such a situation would threaten a “full-fledged nuclear war.” Commenting on his words, the Kremlin pointed to Moscow's readiness to give “the most decisive answer”; on attempts to intervene in a special operation in Ukraine. At the same time, the presidential press secretary Dmitry Peskov assured that any outcome of the special operation would not be a reason for the use of nuclear weapons.

Read on RBC Pro Pro The US market has reached a fair assessment. This is evidenced by the “Rule 20” Articles Pro Jack Dorsey-style biohacking: why a billionaire eats once a day nerves and time”: do employees want to be bosses — a survey Research Pro The smell of reality: how startups are trying to “flavor” the metaverse Articles Pro Meditation changes the brain. Is it so Research Pro Pay big, get fired fast: what it's like to work at Netflix – in 5 points Articles

The Pentagon emphasized that they would not discuss the possibility of using nuclear weapons because of the situation in Ukraine. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin explained: “Such rhetoric is dangerous and not useful. Nobody wants a nuclear war that nobody can win. Saber-rattling and dangerous talk obviously do no good. A similar position was taken in the White House, press secretary Jen Psaki said that the goal of the United States is to reduce the degree of rhetoric on the issue of the likely use of nuclear weapons.

American Ambassador to Russia John Sullivan said that the rhetoric about the use of nuclear weapons by Moscow has escalated a lot lately. He called Lavrov's words about the risk of nuclear war “nuclear blackmail”.

At the end of April, Reuters, citing a source in the Pentagon, reported that Washington was monitoring the state of Russia's nuclear potential, “as far as possible”, no signs of a threat to US or NATO territory.

Authors Tags Subscribe to RuTube RBC Live broadcasts, videos and recordings of programs on our RuTube channel

Источник rbc.ru

Russia’s permanent representative to the EU refused to consider the United States “the ruler of the world”

The day before, the US Treasury Department said that the United States is discussing with its allies a limit on the purchase prices of Russian oil. Russia's permanent representative to the EU said that the world is not limited to the United States, and oil consumption is actively growing in other regions

Vladimir Chizhov

The world is much wider than the United States, and energy consumption is growing primarily in Asia, Africa, Latin America, where “Russian energy carriers will be glad to see.” So the Permanent Representative of Russia to the EU Vladimir Chizhov on the sidelines of the SPIEF commented on RIA Novosti Washington's plans to limit Moscow's oil revenues.

“Let's see, because the United States is not the ruler of the world,”— said the diplomat.

The day before, US Deputy Treasury Secretary Adewale Adeyemo said that Russia, after the start of the military operation in Ukraine, probably increased its oil revenues, so Washington is discussing with its allies the possibility of introducing a ceiling on purchase prices for supplies from Russia.

Earlier, the head of the US Treasury, Janet Yellen, voiced this idea: on May 20, she said that Western countries could create a cartel of Russian oil buyers to control the increase in fuel prices, and within this cartel a price limit would be set that would reduce Russian budget revenues without causing ” “too much pressure on the global economy.” The minister warned that such a move could cause “stagflation-type shocks.”

In March, the United States banned oil and gas imports from Russia, and in April, Deputy National Security Adviser Dulip Singh said that Washington intends to deprive Moscow of all income from the export of these resources. In June, the European Union imposed sanctions against Russian oil, banning its shipments by sea.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov ruled out budget losses in 2022 due to restrictions imposed by the EU. According to him, Russia, on the contrary, will increase its profits from energy exports: the country has alternative markets, where Moscow is already increasing supplies. Deputy Prime Minister Alexander Novak previously reported that Russia has increased exports to the Asia-Pacific region.

Read on RBC Pro Pro Fuel market in new realities: what to expect from gasoline prices Pro I want to make a training plan. What's Important to Consider How the Ukraine Conflict Made Investors Forget ESG and Ecology Pro Is it worth it to adopt the strange healthy lifestyle habits of Silicon Valley Articles Authors Tags Subscribe to Telegram

Источник rbc.ru

Politico learned about the problems of the United States in the supply of Gray Eagle drones to Ukraine

The military of Ukraine will have to undergo a long training in the use of Gray Eagle drones. Washington has not yet made a final decision on supplies, it may be blocked by Congress

The process of transferring four American MQ-1C Gray Eagle drones to Ukraine faced problems in logistics and training of the Ukrainian military, Kyiv is unlikely to be able to use drones in combat in the coming weeks or months, writes Politico, citing Pentagon sources and experts.

Interlocutors of the newspaper in the military department indicated that training in the use of the Gray Eagle usually takes months, depending on the configuration, these models are much more difficult to operate drones with a shorter range. At the same time, the manufacturing company General Atomics admitted that the training process for the Ukrainian military could be reduced due to “urgent needs”; Kyiv. Developer spokesman Mark Brinkley told Politico it could take four to five weeks.

In addition, the decision of the American administration to transfer drones to Kyiv is not final, congress may block the supply, this issue continues to be discussed in the Pentagon and the White House.

The deal was a sale to another state of equipment that is on the balance sheet of the American not by transferring from the presidential reserve fund, which could slow down the process, the newspaper writes. Politico explains that overseas sales require formal requests, State Department approval, and congressional notice, which could prevent the deal from happening within 30 days.

The use of the Gray Eagle requires extensive ground infrastructure, including encrypted communication channels, runways and special equipment, Vertical Flight Society expert Dan Gattinger explained in an interview with the publication. He pointed out that it is still unclear where the Ukrainian forces will be able to base drones and operators, while adding that operators will be able to control them from outside Ukraine with access to satellite communications.

Read on RBC Pro Pro We give a guarantee against the loss of money: what mistakes can cost the importer dear Instructions Pro And live in peace: six countries to change tax residence Articles Pro How value shares save investors when the market falls Articles Pro Fuel market in new realities: what to expect from gasoline prices Articles Pro Russia is waiting for galloping inflation. Why it's dangerous for business Articles Pro Why you shouldn't quit smoking with vapes: 4 reasons Articles Pro How retailers can preserve the assortment familiar to Russians Instructions Pro Serendipity: how to make a coincidence non-random Instructions

Politico indicates that Gray Eagle is able to collect a significant amount data during the flight, in the air it is able to hold out up to 30 hours. The drone can also strike with precision-guided Hellfire missiles. The US military has more than 200 Gray Eagle drones, retired US Air Force General David Deptula told the newspaper.

Previously, official Kyiv has repeatedly asked Washington and the authorities of other European countries to provide more modern weapons, the Ukrainian authorities asked for the supply of Gray Eagle, in particular, at the end of April. The United States has already donated Switchblade and Phoenix Ghost kamikaze drones, but Kyiv is interested in Gray Eagle and Reaper due to the fact that these models are able to travel long distances, fly at high altitude and reload.

Kyiv by then has already held talks with General Atomics, but deliveries of strike UAVs are subject to the US Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR), which restricts their deliveries. Some US partners, including Qatar and Indonesia, were previously unable to receive the Gray Eagle and Reaper, Politico pointed out.

By early June, the Pentagon had been discussing the transfer of Gray Eagle drones to Ukraine for several weeks, sources told Reuters. The Pentagon then told the agency that there was “nothing to announce” yet; on this issue.

Authors Tags Subscribe to Telegram RBC Stay up to date with the latest news even in conditions of blocking

Источник rbc.ru

American economist called the monstrous mistake of the United States in relation to Putin and Russia

The expert explained which economy should be compared with the Russian one.

Political analyst James Dore said on a YouTube show that the US government made the mistake of thinking Russian President Vladimir Putin's words about Russia's economic power – this is a bluff.

According to him, eight years ago, Republican Senator Lindsey Graham from South Carolina said that economically Russia was comparable to Italy, and it is not clear how the president manages to win poker with such weak cards.

The expert bluntly stated that at the moment the ruble is becoming “the most reliable currency in the world”, – the expert repeated these words twice, focusing the attention of the channel's subscribers on this.

He believes that in the economic confrontation with the West, Russia wins, because its opponents had to face the opposite effect of the imposed sanctions – rising fuel and food prices around the world.

“It is extremely rare for the West to make such monstrous mistakes in evaluating economies”, — RIA Novosti quotes Dora.

A more correct comparison, which the United States did not make, would be if they compare the economy of the Russian Federation with Japan or Germany. Therefore, an attempt to abruptly break off cooperation with this country led to the restructuring of the entire world market.

Recall, as Topnews wrote, the sanctions turned into problems for Europe and the United States, where fuel prices rose to a record high.

In Moscow, the introduced economic measures are called a previously unprecedented war. According to Vladimir Putin, the goal of the West – deteriorating living conditions of millions of people.

Join our VK group to keep abreast of events in Russia and the world

Источник topnews.ru

In the United States, the decisions of the pilots, from whose board people fell in Kabul, were considered correct

The US military considered the actions of the pilots of the C-17 aircraft that took off from Kabul in August last year to be consistent with common sense. Then several Afghans died after trying to cling to the chassis

Antonov suggested that the United States “already now” start discussing the START-3 treaty

At present, the United States does not express readiness to resume a dialogue on strategic stability, Moscow calls for a discussion of this topic to begin now, RIA Novosti said. Russian Ambassador to the United States Anatoly Antonov.

«In a few years— in 2026— it (the START-3 treaty) will expire. Is it in the national interests of the United States that we will not have contacts between the military, diplomats on strategic stability? I don't think so, — Antonov said

The Russian diplomat expressed confidence that in this case “time does not wait”, and the parties “should start working on what will replace it now.”

Russia and the United States concluded the START-3 treaty in 2010 for ten years, it entered into force in 2011. The agreement provided for the reduction of each of the parties deployed nuclear warheads to 1500, and intercontinental ballistic missiles, ballistic missiles of submarines and strategic missile-carrying bombers— up to 700.

On February 5, 2021, the contract expired. The administration of former US President Donald Trump offered to connect China to it, but Russia refused. In January 2021, current US President Joe Biden submitted a proposal to extend START-3. In February 2021, the parties agreed to extend the contract for five years.

In early June, the State Department said that the United States wants the START-3 nuclear arms restrictions to be maintained after the expiration of the treaty. The US Foreign Office noted that although the provisions of START-3 were agreed against the background of “a different climate in relations with Russia”, the agreement remains in force.

The Russian Foreign Ministry previously reported that Moscow and Washington continue to engage in dialogue on restrictions on nuclear weapons. In particular, the parties continue to discuss START-3 and inspections, which the parties have suspended due to the pandemic.

Read on RBC Pro Pro Being a vegan is useful. Is it true? What to expect from the giant's promotions Articles Pro Three useful exercises to help overcome shyness Instructions Pro When an IT specialist can be replaced by a software robot and save money Articles Pro Digitalization for aksakals: how Russians earn money in Uzbekistan RuTube RBC Live broadcasts, videos and recordings of programs on our RuTube channel

Источник rbc.ru

The expert assessed the possibility of the presence of Russian ships in Nicaragua: the underbelly of the United States

Leonkov explained the meaning of the proposal of President Daniel Ortega

The Nicaraguan edition of La Gaceta published on its pages a decree of President Daniel Ortega, which states: starting from the second half of this year, it is allowed to the presence for humanitarian purposes of warships and aircraft of a number of countries, including Russia. We asked for expert opinion on the features provided by the Central American state.

What military prospects in this regard are opening up for our country, “MK” explained the military analyst, editor of the magazine “Arsenal of the Fatherland” Alexei Leonkov.

A number of experts saw in this decision of the President of Nicaragua unprecedented prospects: Russian military bases in the underbelly of the United States with medium-range missiles. And they even began to draw pictures with “Caliber” and “Daggers” getting from Nicaragua to Florida, including Cape Canaveral.

Here they, of course, got excited. In fairness, it should be noted that Russia is not the only country whose army was invited by Daniel Ortega for “humanitarian missions” to the territory of Nicaragua. The list also includes countries that are members of the conference of the armed forces of Central America: Guatemala, El Salvador, Honduras, Dominican Republic. And also Mexico, Venezuela, Cuba and, oddly enough, the United States.

How can one explain this step of Daniel Ortega, made immediately after the Biden summit of the “Two Americas”? Why is there such a wide range of countries in the decree of the Nicaraguan leader on military cooperation – from Russia to the United States inclusive?

– If Ortega said that he was going to let only Russia, and even more so China, he would have greatly strained his northern neighbor – the United States. – says Alexei Leonkov. – The secret services would immediately become more active there, with all the ensuing consequences.

US President Biden has just held the long-awaited “summit of the Americas” – North and South. He promised to distribute money to everyone. Although the amounts promised to the neighbors turned out to be absolutely incomparable with those huge billions of dollars that go to help Ukraine.

– Yes, but no one entered into an open confrontation with the United States there either (note that the United States, as the host country of the summit, refused to invite representatives of Nicaragua, Cuba and Venezuela, which led to a boycott of the event by the leaders of a number of Latin American states – “MK”). Especially Daniel Ortega. He is a “hard-boiled man” and understands perfectly well that Nicaragua is a small country, and if he goes into a fundamental conflict with Biden, he can “break away” on the “defense of democracy” in his small country. Moreover, it will not cost Biden anything. On the contrary, he will earn points on this, which will only go to plus his falling ratings. Biden now urgently needs some kind of victory, and Ortega, of course, will not openly provoke him.

That is why this document contains such a wide list of countries. Say, guys, please come to us with humanitarian missions – the fight against some pirates, or floods – we will always be happy to help you. But in fact, this is such a veiled invitation to Russia …

– That's it. But at the same time, one condition: you will have to ask us if you can come to us? And we will decide who to let in and who not. Thus, the Americans must understand: they seem to be able to enter, but they still have to ask the hosts.

– This means that we are gaining serious influence points around the world. And Latin America has been looking in our direction for a long time. First of all, Cuba and Venezuela. Nicaragua can also be included in this list.

And, of course, in Nicaragua they understand that it is one thing to simply express loyalty to someone, but if such loyalty is backed up by the presence of Russian military equipment, then this is a completely different alignment.

And you need to start here, of course, small. Suppose, for a start, they are allowed to enter the ports of the country in order to replenish food and water supplies. We have ships in the Atlantic, they go to Cuba, to Venezuela. Even our strategic Tu-160 aircraft flew there recently.

Many countries now see America losing its grip. Including thanks to Russia, therefore, such an ally as our country will not hurt anyone.

– For us, such an invitation to our Armed Forces – fleet and aviation – means a lot. Think for yourself: what kind of Russian military aircraft can fly to Nicaragua? Only strategic aircraft. Nothing else will fly. Well, maybe another IL-96 as a civilian aircraft. But we are talking about the military. That is, our “strategists” are hinted: come to visit us, we will refuel you here, treat you with fruit …

– Rather, to military-technical cooperation, where certain horizons and contours are indicated: if possible, in the future we could become, for example, a temporary base for you. We flew in, refueled, took part in humanitarian actions and flew away. Or, let's say, there was a Russian expeditionary naval strike group, entered Nicaragua, conducted joint exercises to catch some drug dealers – pirates of the Caribbean – took a break and went home again.

– Yes, this is actually the same as Cuba, close, close to the USA. Well, of course, if we consider this Nicaragua-Cuba-Venezuela triangle in military-technical terms – if I planned it – then here, of course, Nicaragua and Cuba need to be more actively protected by air defense systems.

It is necessary to install a radar station on the island of Cuba that would “see” the entire territory of the United States, as well as warning systems for missile attacks. In Norway, not far from Murmansk, do they have such a station? Why don't we put a similar radar closer to US territory? You bet and we will. And we’ll also protect it with air defense systems – otherwise you never know, suddenly more and more nervous presidents will come to power there every year?

Approximately the same air defense system could be installed in Nicaragua, creating there layered defense, which should include the S-300 or S-400 complexes, as well as the Buk and Tor complexes. And that's it: the country is immediately protected from the air from possible threats. And we can service this equipment, quietly enter it, establish connections …

– Yes. Our “three hundred”, “beeches” and “toras” are just standing there. With their help, a layered air defense system was created in Venezuela. The Americans have already tried it “by the tooth”, nothing happened. To break through such air defense, you will need to lose a lot of your planes, so they no longer go there. They don't want to embarrass themselves.

Well, if we do the same in Nicaragua, then our “strategists” could eventually fly there. And there, you see, we will bring them our new fighters, new helicopters through Venezuela.

– Well, yes. But we need trade routes, we are developing economic ties with these countries, right? This means that it is necessary to ensure the safety of both these routes and these countries. It's not us, but we and them are being clamped down with all sorts of sanctions, our goods are not allowed in.

But, mind you, we are doing everything peacefully and exclusively for humanitarian purposes. For example, civilian dry cargo ships or some container ships can go there. Although many people know that they can also be transported by missile launchers, for example, anti-ship But this is so, just in case. You never know…

Источник www.mk.ru

The Russian Ambassador to the United States spoke about the letter with the call to “renounce the homeland”

Russian Ambassador to the US Antonov said he received a letter calling to condemn Putin's actions According to Anatoly Antonov, the letter also invited him to condemn the actions of the Russian president. If he agreed to do this, he would have to contact the office of the First Deputy Secretary of State of the United States, the letter said

Anatoly Antonov

Russian Ambassador to the United States Anatoly Antonov said he received a letter urging him to condemn the actions of President Vladimir Putin. He announced this on the air of Channel One.

“In my address, I recently received a letter in the mail calling for me to renounce my homeland, so that I condemn the actions of the Russian president. If I do this, I was asked to contact the office of First Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman, — Antonov explained, calling the message he received “provocative”.

According to him, the Russian diplomatic mission turned to the US State Department for clarification.

Antonov also said that near the Russian embassy, ​​unidentified people were handing out cards with FBI contacts and offering to talk to its employees. “I have no reason to say unequivocally that these are representatives of special services or provocateurs, I say that there are such facts <…>»,— added the ambassador.

In addition, he drew attention to the fact that articles appeared in the American media calling on Russian servicemen and diplomats to “betray their homeland.”

“I will emphasize my the most severe rejection of such a policy and such an attitude towards Russian diplomats, — noted Antonov.

Read on RBC Pro Pro Russia is waiting for galloping inflation. How dangerous it is for business dancing, tongue twisters: what will help improve brain function Articles Pro Does music really help to relax and concentrate Articles Pro Europe has imposed an oil embargo. What will happen to LUKOIL shares Forecasts Pro What tools will help the CFO to successfully cope with protecting the budget? “Every day, anti-Russian actions take place near our diplomatic mission, hooligan antics, acts of vandalism take place,” — he added. The ambassador also agreed with the statement that the Russian diplomatic mission resembles a besieged fortress, saying that it operates in a hostile environment.

Authors Tags Subscribe to RuTube RBC Live broadcasts, videos and recordings of programs on our RuTube channel

Источник rbc.ru

Ambassador Sullivan ruled out a break in relations between Russia and the United States

Washington and Moscow cannot completely sever diplomatic relations, as they must maintain bilateral contacts, US Ambassador to Russia John Sullivan said in an interview with TASS.

“We will also never part at all. We cannot take and break off diplomatic relations and stop talking to each other,— he said.

In late May, US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken, speaking to alumni of Georgetown University, quoted American singer Taylor Swift's song “We are never ever getting back together.” and hinted that Washington might not re-establish relations with the Russian leadership. Then he said that he would like to dedicate these words personally to Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov later said that Moscow would “seriously think” before resuming relations with Western countries, even if they themselves offered to do so .

Tags Subscribe to RuTube RBC Live broadcasts, videos and recordings of programs on our RuTube channel

Источник rbc.ru

The Foreign Ministry demanded from the United States an explanation for the transfer of Russian Mi-17s to Ukraine

The United States intends to transfer Russian-made helicopters to Ukraine, the contract for the purchase of which does not provide for their transfer to Kyiv, Zakharova said. She accused Washington of “unbridled desire to pump” Kyiv with weapons “The Foreign Ministry demanded that the US explain the transfer of Russian Mi-17s to Ukraine” />

Russia is demanding an explanation from the United States for the decision to transfer four Mi-17 helicopters to Ukraine, which Moscow previously supplied to Washington for use only by the armed forces of Afghanistan, said Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova. Her statement is published on the website of the department.

“Only this way, and nothing else. However, these legal restrictions, as we see, are not an obstacle for Washington in its unrestrained desire to pump weapons to Kyiv,— Zakharova wrote.

The representative of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs emphasized that the rules for the operation of helicopters were enshrined in the contract and the end user certificate. Moscow has repeatedly appealed to Washington with comments on compliance with the agreements, she noted, but Washington insists that military assistance to Ukraine strengthens only the country's defense, and US actions are in line with national interests and legislation. She called the decisions of the American authorities “another egregious fact of violation by the American side of its international obligations.” and “the policy of double standards”.

The representative of the Foreign Ministry also criticized the supply of multiple launch rocket systems (MLRS) to Ukraine, doubting Kyiv's guarantees that military equipment would not be used for strikes outside the country. She continued: “We know very well and remember from the history of ‘observance’ of Kyiv what Kyiv’s assurances are worth. Ukrainian side of the Minsk agreements.

We are talking about a $ 700 million military aid package for Ukraine, which US President Joe Biden announced two days earlier, on June 1. He clarified that Kyiv would be provided with “timely and necessary” support, including the Himaris MLRS and its ammunition. The Pentagon added that four Mi-17 helicopters, two radar stations, five anti-artillery radars, 1,000 Javelin man-portable anti-tank missile systems and 50 missile launchers, 15,000 155-mm artillery shells and other weapons will also be sent to Ukraine. At the same time, the department did not specify how the helicopters came into the possession of the United States.

Read on RBC Pro Pro Why you have to play office politics, even if you don't want to Pro Instructions The US and China are fighting for the rare earths market. How to make money on it Articles Pro How to work less and increase productivity: 4 tips Articles Pro Whether to adopt the strange healthy lifestyle habits of Silicon Valley Articles Pro The IRS thinks that the cost of the manager is too high. How to be Instructions Pro What to do if an employer forces you to quit Articles Pro Why do we dream: 5 theories Articles Pro Tax nuances: what you need to keep in mind when starting a business in Armenia Articles

Washington has previously transferred Mi-17 helicopters to Kyiv, they included in the aid package announced in mid-April. Then they decided to send 11 helicopters to Ukraine.

Five Mi-17 helicopters were already in Ukraine at the time of the start of the Russian special operation, Ukrainian enterprises were engaged in repairing machines, since they were familiar with Soviet-made equipment, The Washington Post wrote, pointing out that in total the United States then planned to transfer 16 helicopters to Kyiv. The helicopters were technically still owned by the Afghan government, but since they were paid for by the US budget as part of aid to Afghanistan, the Pentagon notified Congress last December that it intended to treat the helicopters as the property of the ministry, the newspaper wrote.

Authors Tags Subscribe to Telegram RBC Stay up to date with the latest news even in conditions of blocking

Источник rbc.ru

Evil microbe. Under the guise of a good cause, the United States artificially caused epidemics

Weekly “Argumenty i Fakty” No. 22. Science tortures boys and girls too 01/06/2022

The United States is collecting biological materials in the post-Soviet space, studying the specifics of the spread of dangerous diseases, and developing bioweapons in Ukraine.

This was stated byVladimir Putin at the CSTO summit. “As you know, in our common region, the Pentagon has created dozens of specialized biolaboratories and centers, ——  he said. And Ministry of Foreign Affairs representative Maria Zakharovareported that 30 laboratories of Ukraine were working to enhance the pathogenic properties of anthrax, plague and other deadly diseases.

The topic of US military biological activities on the territory of other countries has entered the international political agenda. During a special operation, the Russian military uncovered the facts of an emergency cleansing by the Kyiv regime of traces of a military biological program being implemented in Ukraine, which was funded by the US Department of Defense. Later, US Deputy Secretary of State Victoria Nuland acknowledged that there are facilities in Ukraine where Americans conduct research in the field of biology, and Washington is concerned that Russia will gain access to     them.

We climbed into all institutions

As Vladimir Putin said at the same CSTO summit, American biological laboratories in the post-Soviet space “are by no means engaged in providing practical medical assistance to the population of those countries where they have launched their activities.” Under the guise of a good cause, experiments are being carried out with pathogens in order to artificially cause epidemics.

Americans know how to take advantage of any situation. When the Soviet Union collapsed, they easily got into all the research institutes of the former republics. In 90s. life was hard, there were no reagents in the laboratories, scientists were sitting without a salary, institutions were falling apart. The Americans went to research institutes: let we pay you, and you continue to do research. For this, NGOs were created, through which scientific institutions and enterprises were controlled. George Soros — the one who recently called for the overthrow of President Putin, — on behalf of his foundation he financed many Russian scientists. Experienced scientists recall that due to  NPOs, they managed to travel quite a lot around the world: they trained local doctors, shared experience, fought infections in those countries where the Americans themselves were afraid to go. The money received for these business trips made it possible to make ends meet.

And  it seems there is nothing wrong with this (the iron curtain fell, international cooperation developed), but  the Americans just don do nothing. Entering  medical research institutes, they tried to integrate them in their research system. Its essence is that American scientists want to know where in the world what diseases exist. According to the official version, they need this in order to be ready for outbreaks of infections and in case of trouble, to help the local population in time. But, as it turns out now, under the guise of helping other countries, their specialists conduct research in the interests of their military department. For example, having learned that there are natural foci of some disease in the country (for example, Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever), they study its pathogen, and then secretly, when necessary, throw it on the civilian population. And everything is disguised as a natural outbreak of infection. The purpose of such an operation may be to destabilize the situation, create panic, etc.

Dozens of biological laboratories are located in the post-Soviet space of the USA. There are they in Armenia, Georgia, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan. Moreover, Russian scientists are not allowed into these research centers. And a laboratory was built in Georgia, where even Georgians are not allowed. According to  the former adviser to Saakashvili, Jeffrey Silverman, in this country, American scientists worked with bubonic plague. 

Enhance the functions of the virus

In Ukraine, representatives of the American military department (more precisely, the US Department of Defense Threat Reduction Agency) paid the Ministry of Health to turn a blind eye to their activities, allowing them to do anything in biolaboratories. It was officially announced that the United States, in cooperation with the Ukrainian government, was working on the peaceful study of viruses, but then in the eastern regions, near Donetsk and Kharkov, outbreaks of pneumonia and other infections suddenly appeared. Apparently, it was planned to spray some kind of pathogens and from the air: recently, drones with containers and the necessary equipment were found in Kherson region.

And here is another shocking example. According to the information of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation, from 2019 to 2021  American scientists from the laboratory of the city of Merefa in the Kharkov region conducted tests on patients of the regional psychiatric hospital. Potentially dangerous biological drugs were tested on them. Persons with mental disorders were selected according to age, nationality and immune status.

President of the National Research Center “Kurchatov Institute” Mikhail Kovalchukcompared these experiences with the atrocities of World War II. “The Japanese, „Detachment 731“, were doing experiments in an absolutely inhuman way, — the scientist explained. — The Americans dropped the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki without thinking about anything. Therefore, it doesn't cost anything for them to use us, the Slavs, as a biomaterial for experiments. And in fact, these are not experiments, but training in use of future biological weapons».

Sometimes the opinion is expressed that the Americans, among other things, develop “ethnic bioweapons” in  — — bacteria and viruses that selectively affect people of a certain nationality. In fact, it's impossible to  — this follows from some scientifically based patterns regarding genetics. However, in secret biolaboratories, where outsiders are not allowed to enter, and so there is something to do. For example, you can create a pathogen that is resistant to antibiotics. Or a microbe that will be more evil than usual. What do mean? There is such a term — Gain-of-Function. They are called studies aimed at artificially enhancing the functions of a particular virus. You can make the virus weaker, or, on the contrary, make it stronger, more evil.

Such research is officially prohibited. But, as we now know, there are scientists who believe that the generally accepted rules do not apply to them.

Rate the material

Источник aif.ru